Preclinical study reveals stage-dependent vascular protection and paradoxical tubular toxicity of AcSDKP in kidney disease models, highlighting the need for targeted delivery strategies.
BACKGROUND: Renal interstitial fibrosis and peritubular capillary (PTC) rarefaction drive the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). While N-acetyl-seryl-aspartyl-lysyl-proline (AcSDKP) is an endogenous anti-fibrotic peptide, its specific effects on pericyte-endothelial crosstalk and tubular epithelial survival remain controversial. METHODS: We employed a self-controlled unilateral aristolochic acid (AA)-induced CKD mouse model to evaluate the time-sensitive efficacy of AcSDKP. In vitro, primary murine pericytes, human tubular epithelial cells (HK-2), and endothelial cells were utilized. Functional mechanisms were dissected using VEGF ELISA, RNA-sequencing, and targeted FGFR1 siRNA knockdown. RESULTS: In vitro, AcSDKP potently suppressed TGF-β1-induced pericyte-to-myofibroblast transition (PMT) and robustly restored pericyte-derived VEGF secretion, thereby rescuing endothelial tubulogenesis. In vivo, early AcSDKP intervention (Week 3) significantly mitigated fibrosis, preserved capillary integrity, and improved systemic renal function (BUN/SCr), whereas late intervention (Week 4) was less effective. Transcriptomics identified the VEGF/FGFR1 axis as a primary target of AcSDKP. However, in AA-injured HK-2 cells, AcSDKP paradoxically exacerbated apoptosis despite upregulating FGFR1. Subsequent siRNA knockdown revealed that silencing FGFR1 drastically worsened apoptosis, proving that endogenous FGFR1 upregulation is a compensatory survival response. AcSDKP's epithelial toxicity is fundamentally FGFR1-independent, driven instead by its concurrent inhibition of the Akt survival pathway. CONCLUSION: AcSDKP exerts a compartment-specific dual role in CKD. It is a potent vascular protector that halts PMT and promotes VEGF-driven endothelial repair, but acts as a pro-apoptotic stressor in severely damaged tubules. Its clinical translation necessitates early-stage intervention and optimized delivery strategies to maximize vascular benefits while mitigating epithelial toxicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: