Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Benchmarking study demonstrates improved structural execution and token reductions in enterprise tool-calling agents, suggesting efficient adaptive schema pruning.
Enterprise tool-calling agents face a schema-resolution trade-off: exposing a complete JSON Schema contract preserves formal constraint information but increases context overhead, while aggressive pruning can omit domain constraints required for valid execution. We present Learned Adaptive Schema Resolution (LASR-MCP), a three-tier mechanism combining (1) an empirically selected invariant foundation, (2) proactive task-conditioned constraint prediction, and (3) validator-driven pass-level multi-error in-tree JSON Schema recomposition. We evaluate LASR-MCP on a synthetic enterprise-style supply-chain benchmark comprising 32 evaluation tasks across four operational archetypes. On an unseen template family, the frozen semantic predictor achieves F1 = 0.863 versus 0.250 for a frequency-prior baseline (ΔF1 = +0.612, p < 0.001). In the 32-task development/validation benchmark, reactive recovery increases final structural success from 78.1% to 100.0% and reduces total provider-reported workload tokens by 20.2% at k = 1 and 22.1% at k = 2 relative to full-schema control. A separate post-freeze robustness study across four heterogeneous enterprise-style schemas reports 20.5–25.2% token savings and 16/16 ambiguous-task structural recovery. The results provide empirical evidence for the feasibility of constraint-level adaptive schema resolution within an already selected tool schema. Broader transfer across model families, APIs, and production deployments remains future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anand suchak (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: