Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative review reveals key trade-offs between Wi-Fi beacon stuffing and BLE connectionless modes for proximity services, indicating optimal strategies for real-time ephemeral communication.
The growing demand for services that are instantly accessible and contextually adaptive calls for communication paradigms capable of supporting short-lived, proximity-based interactions. This paper investigates association-less communication, a paradigm that enables nodes to exchange data without pre-established connections, making it well suited for ephemeral interactions. We first formalize association-less communication as a distinct paradigm and establish a unified evaluation framework by systematically analyzing eleven wireless technologies against topological, performance, and deployment criteria. This analysis identifies Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) as the most practical and widely available enablers of such connection-free exchanges. To the best of our knowledge, this survey is the first to provide a structured, comparative, and design-oriented analysis of both paradigms—Wi-Fi Beacon Stuffing and BLE connectionless mode—under a unified conceptual framework. Building on this foundation, the paper examines their performance across three critical application domains: vehicle-to-pedestrian safety systems, proximity marketing and emergency message dissemination, and sensor networks. Through this comparative assessment, the paper highlights their respective strengths, trade-offs, and design implications in terms of range, latency, energy efficiency, and implementation complexity. Finally, it outlines key research directions, including middleware abstractions, hybrid cross-technology integration, content-based filtering, and mobile gateway architectures. The outcomes of this study contribute a unified framework and a practical foundation for developing efficient, scalable, and real-time ephemeral communication systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Issa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: