Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Modeling study demonstrates passive ultrafine particle removal using train-induced piston wind in subway tunnels, indicating energy-efficient air quality control.
Ultrafine particles (UFPs) generated by wheel-rail interaction can accumulate in subway tunnels and are strongly affected by train-induced unsteady airflow. This study proposes a floor-mounted static two-stage electrostatic precipitation system for tunnel-scale particle control by utilizing piston wind during subway operation. A full-scale numerical model coupling train-induced airflow, UFPs transport, and electrostatic removal is developed to compare piston-wind-driven and fan-driven configurations and to optimize key layout parameters, including module spacing, inlet velocity, and ESP height. The results show that UFPs preferentially accumulate in the near-ground region beneath the train, supporting the feasibility of floor-mounted particle interception. The piston-wind-driven system provides passive purification without additional ventilation demand, whereas the fan-driven system improves removal only when the imposed inlet velocity exceeds the local piston-wind velocity of approximately 6 m/s. Reducing module spacing and increasing ESP height improve tunnel-scale removal by expanding spatial coverage and increasing the inlet airflow rate. The optimized configuration reduces the total amount of UFPs in the tunnel by up to 37.38 %. These findings provide practical guidance for tunnel-scale deployment of passive electrostatic purification systems in subway tunnel environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: