Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized double-blind trial finds reduced vasopressor need with levobupivacaine in elderly surgical patients, suggesting superior hemodynamic stability.
Objectives: Primary objective- To Compare hemodynamic profile of intrathecal hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% andLevobupivacaine 0.5% in ASA II and III elderly population undergoing infraumbilical surgeries. Secondary objectives-1) Tocompare requirement of vasopressor between the two groups 2) To compare duration of analgesia between the two groups.Methods: A randomized double-blind interventional study included 90 ASA II–III patients aged ≥60 years undergoing electiveinfraumbilical surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomized to receive 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine or 0.5%hyperbaric Levobupivacaine. Haemodynamic parameters were monitored intraoperatively. Data was analysed using SPSSversion 22 with appropriate statistical tests, considering p < 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: The haemodynamicparameters showed no statistically significant different between the two groups, however vasopressor requirement was higherin Bupivacaine group as compared to Levobupivacaine group showing a statistically significant difference (p <0.05). Durationof analgesia did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusion: Levobupivacaine may be considered a morehemodynamically stable option for spinal anaesthesia in geriatric population undergoing infraumbilical surgeries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dupare et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: