Key result
Childhood malnutrition is linked to reduced chaotic heart rate response, though Approximate Entropy remains unreliable.
Why the study?
Accurate determination of tolerances and embedding dimensions is a major challenge when using Approximate Entropy to evaluate chaotic responses and irregularities of RR intervals.
Does Approximate Entropy reliably identify differences in heart rate variability in malnourished children compared to controls?
Case-Control (n=70)
Does Approximate Entropy reliably identify differences in heart rate variability in malnourished children compared to controls?
Approximate Entropy can identify reduced chaotic heart rate variability responses in malnourished children optimally at embedding dimension 5 and tolerance 0.3, but it remains an unreliable mathematical marker.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Approximate Entropy should not yet guide HRV assessment in malnourished children; leaves open its reliability as a research marker pending validation.
INTRODUCTION: Approximate Entropy is an extensively enforced metric to evaluate chaotic responses and irregularities of RR intervals sourced from an eletrocardiogram. However, to estimate their responses, it has one major problem - the accurate determination of tolerances and embedding dimensions. So, we aimed to overt this potential hazard by calculating numerous alternatives to detect their optimality in malnourished children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 70 subjects split equally: malnourished children and controls. To estimate autonomic modulation, the heart rate was measured lacking any physical, sensory or pharmacologic stimuli. In the time series attained, Approximate Entropy was computed for tolerance (0.1→0.5 in intervals of 0.1) and embedding dimension (1→5 in intervals of 1) and the statistical significances between the groups by their Cohen's ds and Hedges's gs were totalled. RESULTS: The uppermost value of statistical significance accomplished for the effect sizes for any of the combinations was -0.2897 (Cohen's ds) and -0.2865 (Hedges's gs). This was achieved with embedding dimension = 5 and tolerance = 0.3. CONCLUSIONS: Approximate Entropy was able to identify a reduction in chaotic response via malnourished children. The best values of embedding dimension and tolerance of the Approximate Entropy to identify malnourished children were, respectively, embedding dimension = 5 and embedding tolerance = 0.3. Nevertheless, Approximate Entropy is still an unreliable mathematical marker to regulate this.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study conducted a case-control in Malnutrition (n=70). Malnutrition vs. Controls was evaluated on Difference in Approximate Entropy of RR intervals (Cohen's d -0.2897). Malnutrition in children was associated with a reduction in chaotic heart rate response (Cohen's d -0.2897), though Approximate Entropy remains an unreliable mathematical marker for this assessment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: