Why the study?
Evaluating chaotic response and RR-interval irregularities using approximate entropy is problematic due to the choice of tolerance and embedding dimension.
Does Approximate Entropy (ApEn) analysis of heart rate variability effectively differentiate patients with COPD from healthy controls?
Does Approximate Entropy (ApEn) analysis of heart rate variability effectively differentiate patients with COPD from healthy controls?
While Approximate Entropy can identify decreased chaotic heart rate variability in COPD patients, its high dependence on parameter selection makes it an unpredictable clinical marker compared to other techniques.
May refine ApEn use for RR-interval analysis in COPD; leaves open validation before clinical adoption.
Introduction: Approximate entropy (ApEn) is a widely imposed metric to evaluate a chaotic response and irregularities of RR-intervals from an electrocardiogram. Yet, the technique is problematic due to the accurate choice of the tolerance (r) and embedding dimension (M). We prescribed the metric to evaluate these responses in subjects exhibiting symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and we strived to overcome this disadvantage by applying different groupings to detect the optimal. Methods: We examined 38 subjects split equally: COPD and control. To evaluate autonomic modulation the heart rate was measured beat-by-beat for 30 min in a supine position without any physical, sensory, or pharmacological stimuli. In the time-series obtained the ApEn was then applied with set values for tolerance, r and embedding dimension, M. Then, the differences between the two groups and their effect size by two measures (Cohen’s ds and Hedges’s gs) were computed. Results: The highest value of statistical significance accomplished for any effect size statistical combinations undertaken was -1.13 for Cohen’s ds, and -1.10 for Hedges’s gs with embedding dimension, M = 2 and tolerance, r = 0.1. Conclusion: ApEn was capable of optimally identifying the decrease in chaotic response in COPD. The optimal combination of r and M for this were 0.1 and 2, respectively. Despite this, ApEn is a relatively unpredictable mathematical marker and the use of other techniques to evaluate a healthy or pathological condition is encouraged.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David M. Garner (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: