Key result
Higher approximate entropy of minute ventilation identifies dysfunctional breathing in PASC with 81% sensitivity.
Why the study?
Dysfunctional breathing is commonly identified in PASC patients via subjective visual observation of CPET data, lacking an objective quantification method.
Does approximate entropy (ApEn) of minute ventilation during CPET reliably distinguish dysfunctional breathing from normal breathing in patients with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2?
Case-Control (n=107)
Does approximate entropy (ApEn) of minute ventilation during CPET reliably distinguish dysfunctional breathing from normal breathing in patients with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.286% vs 0.143%
p-value: p=<0.05
Approximate entropy of minute ventilation during CPET provides an objective metric that can reliably differentiate dysfunctional breathing from normal breathing patterns in patients with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2.
ApEn may enable objective DB detection on CPET in PASC; leaves open validation and outcome impact before clinical use.
Rationale Dysfunctional breathing (DB) is a commonly identified abnormality in post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) patients undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), and is potentially a contributor to ongoing symptoms. Currently, this oscillating, irregular breathing pattern is identified by visual observation of CPET data by an experienced interpreter, which is subjective. We hypothesise that approximate entropy (ApEn), a regularity statistic that quantifies the unpredictability of time-series data can reliably distinguish DB from normal breathing states. Methods Breath-by-breath CPET data were obtained for 82 PASC subjects and 25 controls. CPETs were visually analysed for DB prior to analysis. Minute ventilation (V′E), tidal volume (VT) and breathing frequency (BF) over time data were normalised with 100% considered as the ventilation at anaerobic threshold (AT) and detrended before ApEn was calculated. Analysis was initiated at 25 W and ceased at AT. Results The ApEnV′Eof PASC subjects with visualised DB was 0.286±0.128 (mean±sd), which was significantly different from control subjects (0.143±0.081) and PASC subjects without visualised DB (0.183±0.104); p<0.05. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis produced an optimal cut-off value of 0.17 for distinguishing DB, which resulted in a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 72%. ApEnVTand ApEn BF were similar among all PASC patients despite visually recognised DB, but significantly greater than controls. Conclusions Identifying DB on CPET requires visual recognition, which has limitations. ApEnV′Eis an objective metric that can reliably differentiate DB from normal breathing patterns on CPET. This can be a valuable addition to keen visual scrutiny of CPET data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eschbach et al. (2025) conducted a case-control in Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) (n=107). Approximate entropy (ApEn) of minute ventilation vs. Controls and PASC subjects without visualised dysfunctional breathing was evaluated on Approximate entropy of minute ventilation (ApEnV'E) (p=<0.05). Approximate entropy of minute ventilation was higher in PASC subjects with dysfunctional breathing (0.286) vs controls (0.143; p<0.05), yielding 81% sensitivity and 72% specificity at a 0.17 cut-off.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: