Key result
Baloxavir linked to ~33% shorter fever duration versus oseltamivir in children with influenza.
Why the study?
Data on the clinical effectiveness of the novel anti-influenza drug baloxavir marboxil in children remain limited.
Does baloxavir marboxil reduce the duration of fever and symptoms compared to oseltamivir in children with influenza?
Observational (n=159)
Does baloxavir marboxil reduce the duration of fever and symptoms compared to oseltamivir in children with influenza?
Hazard Ratio: 0.67
p-value: p=0.05
In children with influenza, baloxavir marboxil may marginally shorten fever duration compared to oseltamivir, though overall symptom duration appears similar.
Should not change antiviral choice in children with influenza; leaves open a possible modest fever benefit pending RCTs.
Data on the clinical effectiveness of the novel anti-influenza drug baloxavir marboxil (baloxavir) in children remain limited. We conducted an observational study to compare the duration of fever and symptoms between baloxavir- and oseltamivir-treated children infected with influenza A and B. In total, 159 outpatients with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 or B/Victoria-lineage infections, aged <19 years, during the 2019-2020 influenza season in Japan were enrolled and assessed the duration of fever and symptoms using the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model. Polymerase acidic (PA) variants were examined before and after baloxavir treatment. In the multivariable analysis, the duration of fever and symptoms was unaltered between the A(H1N1)pdm09 (n = 116) and B/Victoria-lineage (n = 43) groups. Conversely, the fever duration was marginally longer in the oseltamivir-treated group (n = 59) than in the baloxavir group (n = 100) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.67, p = 0.05); however, the duration of symptoms was unaltered between the two groups (HR = 0.74, p = 0.11). No patient presented PA reduced susceptibility marker(s) before baloxavir treatment in the analyzed groups. The PA/E23K variant was detected in one case (1.5%, 1/66) of A(H1N1)pdm09 after baloxavir treatment. One case (2.0%, 1/50) of A(H1N1)pdm09 with an N295S substitution in neuraminidase was detected following oseltamivir treatment. These results suggested that the duration of fever was likely to be shorter with baloxavir than with oseltamivir, but the difference between influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 and B/Victoria-lineage was unclear. It is important to continue evaluating the clinical effectiveness of baloxavir and monitoring its drug susceptibility to the influenza virus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagatsuma et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 or B/Victoria-lineage infections (n=159). Baloxavir marboxil vs. Oseltamivir was evaluated on Duration of fever (HR 0.67, p=0.05). Baloxavir treatment was associated with a marginally shorter duration of fever compared to oseltamivir in children with influenza (HR 0.67; p=0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: