Key result
Higher BMI is linked to higher SBP, but central adiposity remains a stronger independent determinant.
Why the study?
Whether general or central adiposity is the more important determinant of blood pressure was uncertain, and whether their relationships differ substantially by age and sex remained unclear.
Are measures of central adiposity more strongly associated with blood pressure and hypertension than general adiposity in Indian adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=7,601)
Yes
Are measures of central adiposity more strongly associated with blood pressure and hypertension than general adiposity in Indian adults?
Mean Difference: 5
Central adiposity, as measured by waist circumference, appears to be a more important determinant of blood pressure and hypertension than general adiposity (BMI) in Indian adults.
May support prioritizing waist circumference over BMI for BP risk assessment in Indian adults; extends observational data but leaves open causality and interventions.
BACKGROUND: A determinant of blood pressure is adiposity; however, there are uncertainties surrounding whether general or central adiposity is the more important determinant of blood pressure. Further, inconsistent results exist for the relationships of anthropometric measures with blood pressure and hypertension, and whether these relationships differ substantially by age and sex is unclear. We aimed to elucidate the associations of anthropometric measures of general and central adiposity with blood pressure and hypertension, and determine the effect of age and sex on these relationships. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from the Centre for Global Health Research health check-up survey conducted during 2006-2007 of the general population in India (n = 7 601; age 18-59 years). We examined the associations of anthropometric measures (body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, waist-height ratio) with blood pressure components (systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, mid-blood pressure) and hypertension within four (18-29 years, 30-39 years, 40-49 years, 50-59 years) age groups, by sex. We adjusted all analyses for education and location, with further adjustments, variously, for either a measure of central (waist circumference) or general (body mass index) adiposity. RESULTS: greater body mass index or 10 cm wider waist circumference was associated with a 5 and 4 mmHg higher systolic blood pressure, respectively. When considered separately, each anthropometric measure was strongly and positively associated with most blood pressure components in all age groups, and for both sexes. However, with few exceptions, when considered jointly (body mass index adjusted for waist circumference), the associations of body mass index with blood pressure components and hypertension were greatly diminished for both sexes, and particularly in the ≥30 years age groups. By contrast, further adjustment of waist circumference for body mass index did not materially alter the associations of waist circumference with blood pressure components and hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that central adiposity, as assessed with anthropometric measures, may be a more important determinant of blood pressure and hypertension than general adiposity for adults in India.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taing et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Blood pressure and hypertension (n=7,601). Central and general adiposity (waist circumference and body mass index) vs. Lower adiposity was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (5 mmHg higher per 5 kg/m2 greater BMI). Every 5 kg/m2 greater body mass index or 10 cm wider waist circumference was associated with a 5 and 4 mmHg higher systolic blood pressure, respectively, but central adiposity remained a stronger independent determinant.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: