Key result
A 96-well plate method shows low variability and strongly discriminates aspirin and clopidogrel effects.
Why the study?
Can 96-well plate aggregometry and thrombi adhesion measurement detect and differentiate the effects of aspirin and clopidogrel in healthy volunteers?
RCT (n=16)
Open-label
Can 96-well plate aggregometry and thrombi adhesion measurement detect and differentiate the effects of aspirin and clopidogrel in healthy volunteers?
A 96-well plate-based aggregation and adhesion assay offers a rapid and reliable alternative to traditional light transmission aggregometry for assessing aspirin and clopidogrel effectiveness.
Supports scalable platelet testing in research; leaves open clinical adoption for guiding aspirin or clopidogrel therapy.
Aspirin and clopidogrel are key anti-thrombotic therapies. Results from platelet reactivity testing during therapy, have been shown to correlate with future events and would allow for the optimisation of therapy. However, there is little agreement among current tests and there remains a clear clinical need for a universal standardised test. It was the objective of this study to explore the potential of 96-well plate aggregometry as a definitive clinical test of platelet reactivity with respect to aspirin and clopidogrel. A small non-blinded trial of 16 healthy male volunteers assigned to seven days of aspirin (75mg/day) or clopidogrel (75mg/day) therapy. Blood was collected before and on day 7 of treatment. Platelet aggregation was measured using a 96-well plate based aggregation method, and thrombi adhesion measured by colourimetric assay. Platelet agonists used were ADP (0.1-30microM), arachidonic acid (0.03-1.3mM), collagen (0.1-30microg/ml), adrenaline (0.001-100microM), ristocetin (0.2-3mg/ml), TRAP6 amide (0.130microM) and U46619 (0.130microM). Concentration response curves were constructed to each agonist under the various conditions and used to extract data such as log EC(50), Hill slope, and area under the curve. These demonstrated low intra- and inter-assay variability and strong discrimination of drug effects. This study demonstrates the ability of the 96-well plate based aggregation and adhesion method to detect and differentiate between stable aspirin and clopidogrel treatment in healthy volunteers. Moreover, this assay marries the ability to test subjects or patients using a range of platelet agonists with more rapidity and ease than the current gold standard platelet assay, traditional light transmission aggregometry, making it a serious alternative assay for use in clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Armstrong et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Healthy volunteers (n=16). Aspirin or clopidogrel vs. Active comparator was evaluated on Platelet aggregation and thrombi adhesion. A 96-well plate based aggregation and adhesion method demonstrated low intra- and inter-assay variability and strong discrimination of aspirin and clopidogrel effects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: