Key result
Isometric handgrip stress is linked to ~38% higher peak diastolic coronary flow velocity versus rest.
Why the study?
Does 3 T MRI using spiral acquisitions detect reactive changes in coronary flow velocity during isometric handgrip exercise compared to rest in healthy subjects?
Observational (n=9)
No
Does 3 T MRI using spiral acquisitions detect reactive changes in coronary flow velocity during isometric handgrip exercise compared to rest in healthy subjects?
3 T MRI with spiral acquisitions offers a non-invasive method with high temporal and spatial resolution to assess endothelial-dependent coronary vasoreactivity during handgrip stress.
Endothelial-dependent coronary artery vasoreactivity is an important indicator of vascular function and predicts cardiovascular events [ 1 ]. In response to endothelial-dependent stressors, changes in coronary artery cross-sectional area and flow velocity occur which are typically assessed by invasive methods. Magnetic resonance flow mapping is non-invasive and validated for endothelial-independent stressors in humans by comparison with Doppler guidewire measurements [ 2 , 3 ]. One prior study [ 4 ], performed at 1.5 T and recording 7–11 cine frames per cardiac cycle, assessed coronary flow velocity during isometric handgrip exercise, a well-established provocateur of endothelial-dependent vasoreactivity [ 5 ]. As higher magnetic field strengths offer the potential for enhanced temporal and/or spatial resolution, which would support both improved image quality due to reduced blurring and more accurate quantification of diastolic peak velocity, we studied diastolic coronary flow peak velocity with 3 T MRI using spiral acquisitions. Here we describe reactive changes in coronary flow velocity using isometric handgrip exercise in healthy subjects as detected by spiral 3 T MRI with a temporal resolution of 34 ms and an in plane resolution of 0.8 × 0.8 mm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hays et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=9). Isometric handgrip stress vs. Baseline (rest) was evaluated on Peak diastolic coronary flow velocity (p=0.002). In healthy adults, isometric handgrip stress significantly increased peak diastolic coronary flow velocity from 26.8 cm/s at baseline to 37.0 cm/s (p=0.002) as measured by 3 T MRI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: