Key result
Postmortem pacemaker and ICD interrogation provides essential forensic data on death cause and device malfunction.
Why the study?
Pacemakers and ICDs are commonly encountered postmortem, and their detailed evaluation may provide essential forensic information that is not routinely available.
Case Report (n=20)
No
Postmortem interrogation of pacemakers and ICDs can provide essential information for forensic pathologists in determining identity, time, and cause of death.
Pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are implanted medical devices for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. These devices are now commonly encountered in the postmortem situation. The Los Angeles County Department of the Coroner uses the services of a cardiac electrophysiology consultant to interrogate pacemakers and ICDs, producing a detailed picture of the cardiac events recorded by the device. We have used this method to evaluate 20 cases where the ICD or pacemaker provided significant information. We report four forensic cases to illustrate the different applications of pacemaker interrogation and its contribution in forensic investigation. This technique was used to establish identification of the decedent, to determine the cause and time of death, and to determine whether device malfunction could have played a role in the death. We conclude that detailed evaluation of the pacemaker or ICD in selected cases may provide essential information to the forensic pathologist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saint‐Martin et al. (2008) conducted a case report in Deceased individuals with pacemakers or ICDs (n=20). Postmortem pacemaker and ICD interrogation was evaluated on Identification of decedent, cause and time of death, and device malfunction. Postmortem interrogation of pacemakers and ICDs in 20 cases provided essential forensic information, including decedent identification, time and cause of death, and device malfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: