Key result
3D printing for LAAO reduces devices used, fluoroscopy time, and dose versus standard care.
Why the study?
LAAO device placement presents challenges in sizing and positioning, leading to the emergence of 3D printing of LAA models whose benefits and drawbacks needed review.
Does 3D printing of LAA models improve procedural efficiency and outcomes in patients undergoing LAAO procedures?
Systematic Review
Does 3D printing of LAA models improve procedural efficiency and outcomes in patients undergoing LAAO procedures?
3D printing of LAA models improves device sizing accuracy and procedural efficiency during LAAO, with focused application recommended for complex anatomies.
Supports 3D LAA printing to reduce devices, fluoroscopy, and dose in LAAO; extends evidence for personalized planning in complex anatomies.
The placement of a left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device can be a technically challenging transcatheter-based procedure. Key challenges include accurate pre-procedural device sizing and proper device positioning at the LAA ostium to ensure sufficient device anchoring and avoid peri-device leaks. To address these challenges, 3D printing (3DP) of LAA models has recently emerged in the literature, first being described in 2015. We present a review of the benefits and drawbacks of employing this technology for LAAO procedures. Pre-procedurally the use of 3DP can consistently and accurately determine LAAO device size over standard of care approaches. Intra-procedurally 3DP's impact entailed a statistically significant decrease in the number of devices used per procedure, as well as in the fluoroscopic time and dose. Post-procedurally, there is some evidence that 3DP could reduce the rate of peri-device leaks, with limited data on its effect on complication rates. Based on existing evidence, we recommend the focused application of 3DP to cases of complex LAA anatomy and for the training of proceduralists. Lastly, we address the emergence of next generation LAAO devices and AR/VR systems that could limit even this narrow window of clinical benefit afforded by 3DP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tarabanis et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Left atrial appendage occlusion. 3D printing of LAA models vs. Standard of care approaches was evaluated. 3D printing of LAA models for LAAO procedures significantly decreased the number of devices used per procedure, fluoroscopic time, and dose compared to standard of care approaches.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: