Why the study?
Coronary artery disease and malignancy occur more frequently in type 2 diabetes and may share inflammation as a pathogenetic mechanism, but whether a clinical correlation exists between them was unclear.
Is there a relationship between baseline coronary atherosclerotic status, cardiovascular events, and incident malignancies in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=735)
Is there a relationship between baseline coronary atherosclerotic status, cardiovascular events, and incident malignancies in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In asymptomatic type 2 diabetics, malignancy surpassed cardiovascular disease as the most common long-term cause of mortality, and there was no correlation between baseline coronary atherosclerosis and incident malignancy.
INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery disease and malignancy occur more frequently in patients with type 2 diabetes. They may share inflammation as a possible common pathogenetic mechanism, but it is unclear whether a clinical correlation exists between them. METHODS: This prospective cohort study followed 735 asymptomatic diabetics, aged 63.4 ± 5.3 years (mean ± standard deviation) for 12.2 ± 0.6 years after baseline coronary artery calcium scoring and cardiac computed tomography angiography. We examined extent and nature of coronary atherosclerosis and incidence of clinical cardiovascular (CV) events (death or myocardial infarction) and sought a relation to incidence of malignancy and malignancy mortality. RESULTS: Total mortality was 16.5% (121/735 patients): malignancy was cause of death in 48/121 (39.7%) of these and CV events in 44/121 (36.3%). There was no relation between extent of coronary atherosclerosis and incident malignancy (plaque volume 127 [21, 427] mm3 (median [interquartile range]) for incident malignancy versus 153 [24, 427] mm3 no malignancy, p = 0.71) or death from malignancy (plaque volume 176 [26, 646] versus 144 [22, 411] mm3, p = 0.32). There was also no relation between presence of high-risk plaque and incident malignancy (high-risk plaque in 27.1% with malignancy vs. 21.6% without, p = 0.18) or fatal malignancy (p = 0.16). Incident and fatal malignancy were not related to clinical CV events. Independent predictors of incident and fatal malignancy were age, smoking at baseline, and elevated C-reactive protein. CONCLUSION: This study found no relation between extent of coronary atherosclerosis or incidence of CV events and malignancy. Malignancy surpassed CV disease as the commonest long-term cause of mortality in middle-aged and older diabetics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azencot et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes (n=735). Extent of coronary atherosclerosis vs. Lower extent of coronary atherosclerosis was evaluated on Incident malignancy (p=0.71).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: