Key result
Albumin shows no survival benefit over normal saline in cardiac ICU patients but increases costs.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to justify the use of albumin infusion in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit following surgery.
Does albumin intravenous infusion improve mortality, lactate levels, and cardiac index compared to normal saline in post-operative cardiac surgery patients?
Observational (n=1,998)
No
Does albumin intravenous infusion improve mortality, lactate levels, and cardiac index compared to normal saline in post-operative cardiac surgery patients?
p-value: p=0.928
Albumin resuscitation in post-operative cardiac intensive care patients did not improve overall survival compared to normal saline but significantly increased financial burden, suggesting its routine use should be restricted.
Does not support routine albumin over saline in post-op cardiac ICU; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm cost-ineffectiveness.
Purpose: To justify the use of albumin infusion in patients in post-surgery cardiac intensive care unit. Methods: All patients who were hemodynamically stable before the operation and admitted into the surgical intensive care unit following coronary artery bypass, cardiopulmonary bypass, or aortic surgery, had no excessive postoperative bleeding and not on diuretic treatment, were included in the analysis. A total of 1998 patients were divided into two cohorts, viz, the first group was placed on albumin infusion (n = 999) while the second group received normal saline infusion (n = 999). Data were obtained from DICOM files of patients and records of pharmacy. Wilcoxon test or two-tailed paired t-test followed by Tukey post-hoc tests were performed for statistical analysis at 95 % of confidence level. Results: Albumin and normal saline administration did not decrease the duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of mechanical ventilation, need for blood transfusion, and length of hospital stay (p > 0.05). Albumin infusion decreased the need for fresh frozen plasma transfusion from 85 to 67, reduced mortality (p = 0.0005, q = 3.959), lowered serum lactate level (p < 0.0001, q = 43.853), but increased cardiac index (p < 0.0001, q = 12.192) as well as financial burden (p < 0.0001, q = 95.158) for the patients, compared to normal saline group. Conclusion: In view of the foregoing, it is recommended that the use of restriction of albumin resuscitation in surgical intensive care unit should be restricted in this subset of patients evluated in this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Post-operative cardiac surgery (n=1,998). Albumin infusion vs. Normal saline infusion was evaluated on Mortality (overall survival) (p=0.928). In post-operative cardiac intensive care patients, albumin administration for fluid resuscitation did not significantly improve overall survival compared to normal saline (p=0.928) but significantly increased financial burden.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: