Key result
Maternal-fetal medicine specialists report 94% professional support for HLHS pregnancy termination, exceeding pediatric cardiologists.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether the personal beliefs of Maternal-Fetal Medicine specialists impact their counseling of patients with severe fetal cardiac anomalies compared with pediatric cardiologists.
Cross-Sectional (n=34)
Yes
MFM specialists consistently offer comprehensive options including termination for severe fetal cardiac anomalies, showing higher support for termination compared to pediatric cardiologists.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Provider specialty may shape HLHS termination counseling; leaves open whether training can reduce interspecialty variation in fetal cardiac care.
Objective Fetal cardiac anomalies are the most commonly diagnosed structural anomalies. In these cases, Maternal-Fetal Medicine (MFM) specialists are tasked with counseling patients on a spectrum of diagnoses as well as their prognostic implications. A recent study of pediatric cardiologists demonstrated that personal beliefs regarding termination impact the counseling provided to patients. Our objective was to study whether the personal beliefs of MFMs impact counseling of patients with severe fetal cardiac anomalies and to compare these providers to their cardiology counterparts.Methods We conducted an anonymous cross-sectional survey of MFMs in New England that assessed personal beliefs and counseling practices when diagnosing hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). We subsequently compared these providers to the previously surveyed cardiologists.Results A total of 34 respondents representing a broad spectrum of age and experience across several states in New England were analyzed. When presented with the statement “some life is always better than no life at all,” 79% (n = 27) of respondents disagreed and all respondents (n = 34) offered termination, palliative care, and treatment options when counseling patients with HLHS. Additionally, while 74% (n = 25) of providers would personally support a decision to terminate a pregnancy with HLHS, 94% (n = 32) would professionally support the decision to pursue termination.MFMs and cardiologists differed in their responses to “some life is better than no life” and the belief that termination should be offered, though differences did not reach statistical significance. However, with respect to the providers’ personal and professional support of the decision to terminate the pregnancy, the groups of respondents varied significantly in their level of support, both professionally and personally with fewer cardiologists supporting this decision.Conclusion When diagnosing a severe and potentially fatal congenital cardiac anomaly, counseling by MFMs was largely unaffected by personal beliefs regarding termination of pregnancy. While this is consistent with previously published data on counseling practices among pediatric cardiology specialists, some important differences between the specialties were seen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soffer et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) (n=34). Maternal-Fetal Medicine specialty vs. Pediatric cardiology specialty was evaluated on Professional support for the decision to terminate a pregnancy with HLHS. Maternal-Fetal Medicine specialists demonstrated high professional and personal support for pregnancy termination in HLHS, higher than pediatric cardiologists.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: