Key result
Minimally invasive beating-heart redo tricuspid surgery shows safety with ~3% early mortality.
Why the study?
Redo isolated tricuspid valve surgery carries high morbidity and mortality, and its optimal timing remains controversial.
Is a simplified, minimally invasive, beating-heart technique safe and feasible for high-risk patients undergoing redo isolated tricuspid valve surgery?
Observational (n=32)
No
Is a simplified, minimally invasive, beating-heart technique safe and feasible for high-risk patients undergoing redo isolated tricuspid valve surgery?
A minimally invasive, beating-heart technique for redo isolated tricuspid valve surgery is feasible and safe, demonstrating low early mortality in high-risk patients.
Supports feasibility of minimally invasive beating-heart redo tricuspid surgery in high-risk patients; leaves open need for randomized trials versus conventional approaches.
BACKGROUND: Redo isolated tricuspid valve surgery is associated with a high morbidity and mortality, and its optimal timing remains controversial. Hence, here we reviewed the early and midterm results of simplified, minimally invasive, beating-heart technique for redo isolated tricuspid valve surgery in patients at high risk. METHODS: A total of 32 consecutive patients underwent a redo isolated tricuspid valve surgery using minimally invasive, beating-heart technique through a right lateral thoracotomy in our center between June 2016 and April 2020. The mean age of patients was 57.4 ± 8.3 years, and 18 patients (56.3%) were women. The mean preoperative EuroSCORE was 7.8 ± 1.4 (range: 6-11). Follow-up was 87.1% complete, with a mean duration of 26.3 ± 12.3 months. RESULTS: Both in-hospital and 30-day mortalities were 3.1%. Tricuspid valve replacement with bioprosthesis was performed in 30 patients (93.8%), and the remaining two patients (6.2%) underwent tricuspid repair (annuloplasty and leaflet reconstruction). The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 81.5 ± 29.0 min. The overall in-hospital duration and intensive care unit (ICU) times were 13.6 ± 7.6 days and 4.1 ± 2.8 days, respectively. Postoperative complications included prolonged ventilation in six patients (18.8%), acute kidney injury in three patients (9.4%), and neurologic event, wound infection, or permanent third-degree atrioventricular block, in one patient (3.1%) each. A total of 96.9% patients were discharged uneventfully. Four patients were lost to follow-up; there were no midterm deaths in patients who were followed up. CONCLUSIONS: Simplified, minimally invasive, beating-heart technique for redo tricuspid valve surgery is both feasible and safe, and the early and midterm results are excellent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Severe tricuspid regurgitation requiring redo isolated tricuspid valve surgery (n=32). Simplified, minimally invasive, beating-heart technique was evaluated on In-hospital and 30-day mortality. A simplified, minimally invasive, beating-heart technique for redo isolated tricuspid valve surgery was feasible and safe, demonstrating an in-hospital and 30-day mortality of 3.1%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: