Key result
Self-administered LLFDI demonstrates appropriate concurrent validity with other measures in older patients with CHD.
Why the study?
Does the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) demonstrate concurrent validity and accuracy via self-report in older patients with coronary heart disease participating in cardiac rehabilitation?
Cross-Sectional (n=29)
Does the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) demonstrate concurrent validity and accuracy via self-report in older patients with coronary heart disease participating in cardiac rehabilitation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Late Life Function and Disability Instrument is a valid tool that can be independently completed by older patients with coronary heart disease in cardiac rehabilitation.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the concurrent validity of the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and to evaluate the accuracy of information obtained through self-report questionnaire versus interview formats. METHODS: The study included 29 patients older than 60 years attending an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program. Participants completed the LLFDI, three additional self-report criterion measures, and six performance-based tests; they completed the LLFDI a second time via interview. We used descriptive statistics, correlations, and t-tests to analyze the data. RESULTS: All LLFDI components were correlated (rs=0.36-0.83) with the self-report criterion measures. The Function Component of the LLFDI was moderately correlated with the 6-Minute Walk Test (r=0.62), timed up-and-go (r=-0.58), walking speed (r=-0.57), and timed sit-to-stand (r=-0.56) scores. The LLFDI demonstrated a ceiling effect (10%) only in the Disability Limitation component. All LLFDI component scores obtained via self-report questionnaire were correlated with scores obtained via interview; except in a single subcategory, there was no difference between LLFDI scores obtained through self-report questionnaire and those obtained through interview. CONCLUSIONS: RESULTS indicate that the LLFDI has appropriate validity for older patients (>60 years) with CHD and can be completed independently by patients rather than administered by clinicians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanya Kinney LaPier (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary heart disease (n=29). Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) self-report questionnaire vs. LLFDI via interview and other criterion measures was evaluated on Concurrent validity of LLFDI components with self-report criterion measures (rs=0.36-0.83). The Late Life Function and Disability Instrument demonstrated appropriate concurrent validity (rs=0.36-0.83) with other measures in older patients with CHD and can be self-administered.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: