Key result
Urate-lowering therapy linked to ~33% lower all-cause mortality in post-MI patients versus nonusers.
Why the study?
Evidence for urate-lowering therapy in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction is limited.
Does urate-lowering therapy reduce all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in post-myocardial infarction patients?
Cohort (n=1,926)
Does urate-lowering therapy reduce all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in post-myocardial infarction patients?
In a real-world propensity-matched cohort, urate-lowering therapy was associated with lower all-cause mortality and a reduced risk of recurrent MI requiring revascularization in post-myocardial infarction patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for mortality benefit with urate-lowering therapy post-MI; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm causality.
The role of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) for the primary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events has been widely discussed, but its evidence for the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) is limited. Therefore, we conduct a population-based, propensity score-matched cohort study to investigate the CV outcomes among patients with post-MI with and without ULT. A total of 19,042 newly diagnosed in-hospital patients with MI were selected using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016. After 1:1 propensity score matching with covariates, patients with MI with (n = 963) and without (n = 963) ULT were selected for further analysis. The primary outcome was the all-cause mortality and the secondary outcomes were composite CV outcomes, including hospitalization for recurrent MI, stroke, heart failure, and cardiac arrhythmias. ULT users were associated with lower all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR), 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51-0.87) compared to the ULT nonusers. In addition, ULT users had a significantly lower risk of recurrent MI, which needed revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting (adjHR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53-0.86) than the ULT nonusers. The primary and secondary outcomes were not different between patients with post-MI who received uricosuric agents and xanthine oxidase inhibitors. The anti-inflammatory effect of ULT plays an essential role in MI management. From a real-world setting, this study shows that ULT is associated with the lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with post-MI. In addition, the result shows the possible lower incidence of repeat revascularization procedures in the ULT users.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tai et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction (n=1,926). Urate-lowering therapy vs. No urate-lowering therapy was evaluated on All-cause mortality (adjHR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.87). Urate-lowering therapy was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in post-myocardial infarction patients compared to nonusers (adjHR 0.67; 95% CI 0.51-0.87).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: