Key result
Review outlines heart team functions, structural heart disease challenges, and strategies for integrating trainees.
Why the study?
Training in structural heart disease is widely variable and not standardized, and the integration of trainees within the heart team has not been fully defined.
Highlights the need for standardized multimodality training and better integration of trainees within structural heart disease teams.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support revising structural heart training programs; leaves open effects on procedural outcomes.
Structural heart disease is a rapidly evolving field. However, training in structural heart disease is still widely variable and has not been standardized. Furthermore, integration of trainees within the heart team has not been fully defined. In this review, we discuss the components and function of the heart team, the challenges of current structural heart disease models, and possible solutions and suggestions for integrating trainees within the heart team.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ibrahim et al. (2023) conducted a review in Structural heart disease. Integration of trainees within the heart team was evaluated. This review discusses the components and function of the heart team, challenges of current structural heart disease models, and suggestions for integrating trainees within the heart team.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: