Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 1, 1986Obstetric Anesthesia Digest

Comparison of the Effects of General and Regional Anesthesia for Cesarean Section on Neonatal Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Scores

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

General versus regional anesthesia for cesarean section lacks specific results for neonatal neurologic scores.

Authors

TAT. K. AbboudUniversidad MayorSNS. NagappalaUniversity of Southern CaliforniaKMK. MurakawaNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Neonatal neurologic and adaptive scores after general versus regional cesarean anesthesia remain unclarified; leaves open optimal approach.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Abboud et al. (1986) studied this question. General and regional anesthesia for cesarean section were compared regarding neonatal neurologic and adaptive capacity scores, but the provided abstract lacks specific results.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa82e2d87306b362e876759https://doi.org/10.1097/00132582-198606000-00006
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of the Effects of General and Regional Anesthesia for Cesarean Section on Neonatal Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Scores1985 · 34 citations
  2. 2Effects of General Anesthesia vs Regional Anesthesia on Neonatal Outcomes: A Systemic Review and Mata Analysis2016 · 1 citations
  3. 3Anesthesia for Cesarean Section???Effects on Neonates1989 · 87 citations
  4. 4Comparative Analysis of General vs. Spinal Anesthesia on Neonatal Outcomes in Cesarean Sections: A Retrospective Study2026
  5. 5Comparison of the Effects of General Anesthesia with Remifentanil and Spinal Anesthesia on Newborn and Mother in Elective Cesarean Section2023