Key result
Everolimus conversion links to ~16% improved creatinine clearance and calcineurin inhibitor minimization in heart transplants.
Why the study?
The clinical reasons for conversion to everolimus and its long-term outcomes in maintenance heart transplant recipients were not well defined.
Does conversion to everolimus improve kidney function and allow calcineurin inhibitor minimization in maintenance heart transplant recipients?
Observational (n=222)
Yes
Does conversion to everolimus improve kidney function and allow calcineurin inhibitor minimization in maintenance heart transplant recipients?
Conversion to everolimus in maintenance heart transplant recipients allows for the minimization or suspension of calcineurin inhibitors and improves kidney function in patients with nephrotoxicity.
May inform individualized EVL conversion in HT with nephrotoxicity; hypothesis-generating observational data leaves optimal timing and outcomes open.
AIM: To determine the clinical reasons for conversion to everolimus (EVL) and long-term outcomes in heart transplant (HT) recipients. METHODS: A retrospective 12-mo study has been carried out in 14 Spanish centres to assess the efficacy and safety of conversion to EVL in maintenance HT recipients. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-two patients were included (mean age: 53 ± 10.5 years; mean time from HT: 8.1 ± 4.5 years). The most common reasons for conversion were nephrotoxicity (30%), chronic allograft vasculopathy (20%) and neoplasms (17%). The doses and mean levels of EVL at baseline (conversion to EVL) and after one year were 1.3 ± 0.3 and 1.2 ± 0.6 mg/d and 6.4 ± 3.4 and 5.6 ± 2.5 ng/mL, respectively. The percentage of patients receiving calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) at baseline and on the final visit was 95% and 65%, respectively. The doses and mean levels of CNIs decreased between baseline and month 12 from 142.2 ± 51.6 to 98.0 ± 39.4 mg/d (P < 0.001) and from 126.1 ± 50.9 to 89.2 ± 47.7 ng/mL (P < 0.001), respectively, for cyclosporine, and from 2.9 ± 1.8 to 2.6 ± 1.9 mg/d and from 8.3 ± 4.0 to 6.5 ± 2.7 ng/mL (P = 0.011) for tacrolimus. In the subgroup of patients converted because of nephrotoxicity, creatinine clearance increased from 34.9 ± 10.1 to 40.4 ± 14.4 mL/min (P < 0.001). There were 37 episodes of acute rejection in 24 patients (11%). The most frequent adverse events were oedemas (12%), infections (9%) and gastrointestinal problems (6%). EVL was suspended in 44 patients (20%). Since the database was closed at the end of the study, no further follow-up data is available. CONCLUSION: Conversion to EVL in maintenance HT recipients allowed minimisation or suspension of the CNIs, with improved kidney function in the patients with nephrotoxicity, after 12 mo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicolás Manito (2015) conducted an observational in Maintenance heart transplant (n=222). Conversion to everolimus vs. Baseline was evaluated on Acute rejection. Conversion to everolimus in maintenance heart transplant recipients allowed calcineurin inhibitor minimization and improved creatinine clearance from 34.9 to 40.4 mL/min (P<0.001) in nephrotoxicity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: