Key result
Direct current application successfully induces VF in 62% of attempts to determine defibrillation thresholds.
Why the study?
Does direct current (DC) application effectively induce ventricular fibrillation for the determination of the defibrillation threshold in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators?
Does direct current (DC) application effectively induce ventricular fibrillation for the determination of the defibrillation threshold in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators?
Direct current application using a 9-V battery is an effective alternative method for inducing ventricular fibrillation to determine defibrillation thresholds in ICD patients.
DC application may offer an alternative VF induction method for DFT testing in ICD patients; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
For the determination of the defibrillation threshold, the induction of ventricular fibrillation is mandatory. However, in severely damaged hearts it is sometimes difficult to induce ventricular fibrillation by rapid stimulation or alternating current. Only rapid nonclinical ventricular tachycardias may result, and their cardioversion threshold may be different from the defibrillation threshold. Therefore, it was the purpose of this study to test the potential of direct current (DC) application to rapidly induce ventricular fibrillation in patients with an implanted cardioverter defibrillator. The defibrillation threshold had to be determined in 13 patients (9 with coronary heart disease, 4 with dilative cardiomyopathy, ejection fraction 35%) during and 2 weeks after the implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator. DC was applied 37 times by a commercially available 9-V DC battery via a bipolar catheter for about 3 seconds. Ventricular fibrillation was induced 23 times (62%) and rapid nonclinical ventricular tachycardias were induced six times (16%). In one patient clinical ventricular tachycardia was observed. In seven instances (19%) sinus rhythm remained. In 12 of the 13 patients, ventricular fibrillation could be induced by DC. Thus, the induction of ventricular fibrillation by DC application may serve as an additional tool to induce ventricular fibrillation, determining the defibrillation threshold in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weismüller et al. (1992) studied Patients with an implanted cardioverter defibrillator (n=13). Direct current (DC) application was evaluated on Induction of ventricular fibrillation per application. Direct current application successfully induced ventricular fibrillation in 62% of applications and in 12 of 13 patients, providing an additional tool for determining defibrillation thresholds.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: