Key result
HRT is linked to similar reductions in plasma viscosity and thromboxane B2 regardless of time since menopause.
Why the study?
Does time since menopause affect the effects of transdermal hormone replacement therapy on plasma viscosity, thromboxane levels, and Doppler flow parameters in normal-weight postmenopausal women?
Cohort (n=35)
Does time since menopause affect the effects of transdermal hormone replacement therapy on plasma viscosity, thromboxane levels, and Doppler flow parameters in normal-weight postmenopausal women?
Time since menopause does not affect the potential hemodynamic and rheological benefits of transdermal hormone replacement therapy in normal-weight postmenopausal women.
Supports transdermal HRT hemodynamic effects regardless of time since menopause; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the use of transdermal hormone replacement therapy (HRT), in women within 5 years of menopause compared with women who were postmenopausal for > 5 years, would significantly influence thromboxane B2 levels, plasma viscosity and Doppler flow parameters at the level of the uterine, internal carotid, ophthalmic and bladder wall arteries. METHODS: Thirty-five normal-weight (body mass index > 19 and < 25 kg/m(2)) postmenopausal women (age 54.6 +/- 3.9 years, mean +/- standard deviation) participated in the study and were divided into two groups (Group I: n = 19, time since menopause < 5 years; and Group II: n = 16, time since menopause > 5 years). Patients were treated with a continuous estradiol transdermal supplementation and 12-day courses of medroxyprogesterone acetate every 2 months. They were studied at baseline and after 6 months (in the estrogen-only phase of the cycle). RESULTS: Results showed a beneficial effect of hormone substitution after 6 months of therapy. Baseline plasma viscosity was similar in both groups, and decreased significantly after therapy in both Group I (-17.5%) and Group II (-15.6%). Plasma levels of thromboxane B(2) were similar at baseline and diminished equally in Group I and Group II (-85.6% and -85.2%, respectively) after treatment. Doppler assessment of the pulsatility index at the level of uterine, internal carotid, ophthalmic and bladder wall arteries showed no differences between groups at baseline and revealed a significant reduction of vascular impedance at the end of the treatment in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Time since menopause does not affect the potential hemodynamic benefits of HRT in normal-weight women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mancini et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Postmenopausal (n=35). Time since menopause < 5 years vs. Time since menopause > 5 years was evaluated on Plasma viscosity, thromboxane B2 levels, and Doppler flow parameters. Time since menopause (<5 vs >5 years) did not affect the hemodynamic benefits of 6 months of HRT, which similarly reduced plasma viscosity (-17.5% vs -15.6%) and thromboxane B2 levels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: