Key result
Targeted vitamin D supplementation fails to reduce major cardiovascular events versus usual care in MI patients.
Why the study?
Randomized trials have not demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular events with vitamin D supplementation, potentially due to fixed or non-targeted dosing strategies.
Does targeted vitamin D3 supplementation reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with myocardial infarction?
RCT (n=630)
randomized
Does targeted vitamin D3 supplementation reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with myocardial infarction?
Targeted vitamin D supplementation to maintain levels >40-80 ng/mL does not significantly reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with a history of myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Targeted vitamin D supplementation does not reduce MACE post-MI; confirms lack of primary-endpoint benefit in this RCT population.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Many observational studies have reported associations between low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels and adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. However, randomized trials have not demonstrated a reduction in CV events with vitamin D supplementation, potentially due to fixed or non-targeted dosing strategies. The aim of this study was to determine if targeted vitamin D management among myocardial infarction (MI) patients reduces CV events. METHODS: TARGET-D is a pragmatic randomized trial, where subjects were randomized to usual care or targeted vitamin D management between April 2017 and May 2023 (average follow-up 4.2 ± 2.0 years). The treatment arm received vitamin D3 supplementation and ongoing titration based on a dosing algorithm to reach and maintain a target 25(OH)D level of >40-80 ng/mL. TARGET-D concluded follow-up on 17 March 2025, when ≥104 primary outcome events (major adverse CV events: composite of death, MI, heart failure hospitalization, and stroke) occurred. RESULTS: Participants (n = 630) had a median age of 63 (interquartile range: 55-70) years and 78.1% were men. Baseline 25(OH)D levels were 25 (interquartile range: 18-33) ng/mL, with 87.0% ≤ 40 ng/mL, and 52.4% began vitamin D3 dosing at 5000 IU. Major adverse CV events did not achieve significance [vitamin D: 15.7% vs usual care: 18.4%; hazard ratio (HR) .85, 95% confidence interval .58-1.24, P = .40]. Among secondary endpoints, outcomes for vitamin D vs usual care were 8.9% vs 9.2% for death (HR .98, P = .95), 3.8% vs 7.9% for MI (HR .48, P = .03), 4.2% vs 3.5% for heart failure hospitalization (HR 1.21, P = .65), and 1.6% vs .9% for stroke (HR 1.69, P = .47). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of 25(OH)D insufficiency was high among MI patients. Targeted vitamin D supplementation and ongoing titration did not significantly reduce major adverse CV events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in myocardial infarction (n=630). Targeted vitamin D3 supplementation vs. Usual care was evaluated on Major adverse CV events (composite of death, MI, heart failure hospitalization, and stroke) (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.58-1.24, p=0.40). Targeted vitamin D supplementation did not reduce major adverse cardiovascular events compared to usual care among MI patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: