Key result
Vitamin D supplementation shows no benefit over placebo for overall mortality in advanced heart failure.
Why the study?
Vitamin D supplementation is widely used, but its effects on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure are unclear, prompting evaluation of potential latency effects after trial closure.
Does vitamin D supplementation reduce overall mortality in patients with advanced heart failure?
RCT
Placebo-controlled
Randomized
Does vitamin D supplementation reduce overall mortality in patients with advanced heart failure?
Vitamin D supplementation at 4000 IU daily does not improve overall mortality in advanced heart failure and may increase the risk of hospitalization and need for mechanical circulatory support during active treatment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No mortality benefit from vitamin D in advanced HF; confirms lack of efficacy and supports avoiding routine supplementation.
AIMS: Vitamin D supplementation is widely used in the clinical setting, but its effects on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure are unclear. This paper reports outcome data that were collected during follow-up of 3 years after closure of the EVITA trial (a 3 year randomized, placebo-controlled, intervention study with 4000 IU vitamin D daily in patients with advanced heart failure), to capture potential latency effects of vitamin D supplementation on clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The prespecified primary endpoint was overall mortality. Secondary endpoints included hospitalization, mechanical circulatory support implantation, high urgent listing for heart transplantation, and heart transplantation. For group comparisons, we used Cox regression models with a time-dependent categorical covariate. The calculated net difference in circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D between the vitamin D and placebo groups dropped from 60.9 nmol/L at the end of the active study period to 3.2 nmol/L at the end of the post-intervention period. During the entire 6 year period, 73 patients (36.5%) died in the placebo group and 76 (38.8%) in the vitamin D group. Out of these 149 patients, 36 and 39 died during the first 3 years, and 37 and 37 during the second 3 years, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) for mortality in the vitamin D versus the placebo group was 1.06 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-1.66] for the first 3 years and 1.07 (95% CI: 0.68-1.70) for the 3 year post-intervention follow-up. Compared with the placebo group, the HRs for hospitalization and for mechanical circulatory support implant were significantly higher in the vitamin D group during vitamin D supplementation (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.68 and HR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.08-3.76, respectively) but not after vitamin D discontinuation (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.62-1.94 and HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.38-2.56, respectively). There was no significant time-dependent effect on the risk of high urgent listing for heart transplantation and heart transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: No beneficial latency effects of vitamin D supplementation on overall mortality could be demonstrated. Instead, the disappearance of unfavourable findings in the vitamin D group (higher HRs for hospitalization and for mechanical circulatory support implant) after vitamin D discontinuation supports the assumption of adverse vitamin D effects on the cardiovascular system at doses of 4000 IU daily.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zittermann et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Advanced heart failure. Vitamin D vs. Placebo was evaluated on overall mortality (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.68-1.70). Vitamin D supplementation (4000 IU daily) in advanced heart failure showed no beneficial latency effect on overall mortality during a 3-year post-intervention follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: