Key result
Case management and patient education model undergoes evaluation for thromboembolic and major bleeding events.
Why the study?
Does a primary care case management and patient education intervention reduce major thromboembolic and bleeding events in adult patients on oral anticoagulation?
RCT (n=690)
Single-blind (statistician)
Cluster-randomized
Yes
Does a primary care case management and patient education intervention reduce major thromboembolic and bleeding events in adult patients on oral anticoagulation?
This study protocol describes a cluster-randomized trial evaluating whether a primary care case management and patient education intervention can reduce thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients on oral anticoagulation.
BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic treatment is a continuous therapy that is often performed in general practice and requires careful safety management. The aim of this study is to investigate whether a best-practice model that applies major elements of case management and patient education, can improve antithrombotic management in primary healthcare in terms of reducing major thromboembolic and bleeding events. METHODS: This 24-month cluster-randomized trial will be performed with 690 adult patients from 46 practices. The trial intervention will be a complex intervention involving general practitioners, healthcare assistants, and patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation. To assess adherence to medication and symptoms in patients, as well as to detect complications early, healthcare assistants will be trained in case management and will use the Coagulation-Monitoring List (Co-MoL) to regularly monitor patients. Patients will receive information (leaflets and a video), treatment monitoring via the Co-MoL and be motivated to perform self-management. Patients in the control group will continue to receive treatment as usual from their general practitioners. The primary endpoint is the combined endpoint of all thromboembolic events requiring hospitalization and all major bleeding complications. Secondary endpoints are mortality, hospitalization, strokes, major bleeding and thromboembolic complications, severe treatment interactions, the number of adverse events, quality of anticoagulation, health-related quality of life, and costs. Further secondary objectives will be investigated to explain the mechanism by which the intervention is effective: patients' assessment of chronic illness care, self-reported adherence to medication, general practitioners' and healthcare assistants' knowledge, and patients' knowledge and satisfaction with shared decision making. Practice recruitment is expected to take place between July and December 2012. Recruitment of eligible patients will start in July 2012. Assessment will occur at three time points: baseline and follow-up after 12 months and after 24 months. DISCUSSION: The efficacy and effectiveness of individual elements of the intervention, such as antithrombotic interventions, self-management concepts in orally anticoagulated patients, and the methodological tool of case management, have already been extensively demonstrated. This project foresees the combination of several proven instruments, as a result of which we expect to profit from a reduction in the major complications associated with antithrombotic treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siebenhofer et al. (2012) conducted an RCT in Indication for oral anticoagulation (n=690). Best-practice model (case management and patient education) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Combined endpoint of all thromboembolic events requiring hospitalization and all major bleeding complications. A best-practice model applying case management and patient education is being evaluated in a planned cluster-randomized trial to determine its effect on thromboembolic and bleeding events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: