Key result
Off-pump CABG fails to reduce postoperative AF compared to on-pump surgery.
Why the study?
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to on-pump CABG in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=1,836)
No
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to on-pump CABG in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
Odds Ratio: 0.88 (95% CI 0.69–1.12)
Absolute Event Rate: 19.3% vs 18.3%
p-value: p=0.3
Off-pump CABG does not significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to on-pump CABG, with arrhythmia risk primarily driven by age and preoperative hypertension.
Off-pump CABG was not associated with lower postoperative AF; leaves open whether technique or patient factors predominate.
BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that occurs after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). New surgical techniques, particularly off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB), are thought to be less invasive and results in fewer complications, i.e. AF, but available data are inconsistent. The aim of this study is to present the incidence and risk factors of AF in patients operated on with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: We studied 1836 consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease who were operated on with (CABG) or without (OPCAB) cardiopulmonary bypass. The patients were monitored using a continuous electrocardiogram monitoring system until the sixth postoperative day. RESULTS: Atrial fibrillation occurred in 18.3% and 19.3% of CABG and OPCAB patients, respectively (p = 0.3). The peak incidence of arrhythmia was observed between the second and third postoperative day in both CABG and OPCAB patients (36% and 41%, respectively). Patient's age and history of hypertension were significant predictors of postoperative AF (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.01-1.76, p = 0.0002; and OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.01-1.76, p = 0.008, respectively). Patients who developed AF vs. without AF had significantly higher rates of complications such as death (3.1% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.01), reoperation (5.2% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.02), and the need to utilize intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) (6.8% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.002). Use of IABP and reoperation were significant perioperative predictors of the arrhythmia (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.27-3.4, p = 0.003; and OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.09-3.30, p = 0.02, respectively). AF was also associated with a prolonged stay in an intensive care unit (72.5 ± 78.8 for patients with AF vs. 34.6 ± 25.2 for patients with sinus rhythm, p = 0.000001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing CABG, postoperative AF is a common arrhythmia independent of the type of surgical procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lewicki et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Stable coronary artery disease (n=1,836). Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) vs. On-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was evaluated on Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69-1.12, p=0.3). Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting did not significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to on-pump surgery (19.3% vs 18.3%, OR 0.88, p=0.3).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: