Key result
Higher proBNP 1-108 linked to ~390% greater risk of death or cardiac transplantation.
Why the study?
Simultaneous assessment of unprocessed proBNP(1-108) and processed BNP32 may improve risk stratification in patients with chronic systolic heart failure.
Does the addition of proBNP(1-108) to BNP32 improve risk stratification for all-cause death or cardiac transplantation in ambulatory patients with chronic systolic heart failure?
Population
756 outpatients with predominantly systolic heart failure in the Penn Heart Failure Study
Comparison
Higher versus lower proBNP(1-108) levels in addition to BNP32 measurement
Design
Prospective cohort study
Authors
Loading...
May aid risk stratification beyond BNP32 in ambulatory systolic HF; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Cohort (n=756)
Does the addition of proBNP(1-108) to BNP32 improve risk stratification for all-cause death or cardiac transplantation in ambulatory patients with chronic systolic heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 4.9 (95% CI 2.5–9.7)
p-value: p=<0.001
Simultaneous measurement of unprocessed proBNP(1-108) and processed BNP32 improves risk stratification in ambulatory systolic heart failure patients, particularly when BNP32 levels are low.
Dries et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in chronic systolic heart failure (n=756). Higher levels of proBNP(1-108) vs. First proBNP(1-108) tertile was evaluated on all-cause death or cardiac transplantation (HR 4.9, 95% CI 2.5 to 9.7, p=<0.001). Higher levels of proBNP(1-108) were associated with an increased risk of all-cause death or cardiac transplantation (adjusted HR 4.9; 95% CI 2.5-9.7; P<0.001 for third vs first tertile).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: