Key result
Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting demonstrates encouraging safety in Europe with 0.6% mortality and 0% stroke across 1,266 patients, though adoption remains limited by costs and training.
Population
Patients with ischemic heart disease requiring coronary revascularization
Comparison
Robotic-assisted coronary revascularization vs Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting and…
Design
Editorial
Authors
Loading...
Robotic-assisted coronary revascularization is a safe, less invasive alternative to conventional CABG with excellent clinical outcomes, though widespread adoption remains limited.
Robotic-assisted coronary revascularization is a safe, less invasive alternative to conventional CABG with excellent clinical outcomes, though widespread adoption remains limited.
Pettinari et al. (2022) conducted an editorial in Ischaemic heart disease. Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (RA-CABG) vs. Conventional CABG and PCI was evaluated. Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting demonstrates encouraging safety in Europe with 0.6% mortality and 0% stroke across 1,266 patients, though adoption remains limited by costs and training.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: