Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, I argue that sufficientarian principles are indispensable in the set of principles that have bearing on issues in distributive ethics. I provide two arguments in favor of this claim. First, I argue that sufficientarianism is the only framework that allows us to appropriately analyze what sort of obligations we have toward individuals who are badly off due to their own faults and choices. Second, I argue that sufficientarianism is the only theory that provides an adequate framework for thinking about the desperately badly off.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anders Herlitz (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: