Key result
True nonresponder hypertension linked to ~133% higher cardiovascular event risk versus false nonresponders.
Why the study?
Does true nonresponder hypertension increase the risk of cardiovascular events compared to false nonresponder hypertension in patients on double therapy with uncontrolled clinic blood pressure?
Cohort (n=730)
Does true nonresponder hypertension increase the risk of cardiovascular events compared to false nonresponder hypertension in patients on double therapy with uncontrolled clinic blood pressure?
In hypertensive patients on double therapy with uncontrolled clinic BP, true nonresponders have a significantly higher cardiovascular risk than false nonresponders, supporting the use of ambulatory BP monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
True nonresponder hypertension was associated with higher CV risk than false nonresponse on double therapy; extends cohort data on ABPM discordance but leaves open management impact.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients receiving double therapy with false and true nonresponder hypertension. METHODS: The occurrence of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events was evaluated in 730 patients receiving double therapy with uncontrolled clinic blood pressure. Two hundred and seventy had false nonresponder hypertension (clinic blood pressure > or =140 or 90 mmHg and daytime blood pressure <135/85 mmHg) and 460 had true nonresponder hypertension (clinic blood pressure > or =140 or 90 mmHg and daytime blood pressure > or =135 or 85 mmHg). RESULTS: During the follow-up (4.77+/-2.9 years, range 0.2-11.7 years), 55 cardiovascular events occurred. The event rates per 100 patient-years in patients with false and true nonresponder hypertension were 1.03 and 1.9, respectively. Event-free survival was significantly different between the groups (P<0.05). After adjustment for several covariates, including clinic blood pressure (forced into the model), Cox regression analysis showed that cardiovascular risk was significantly higher in true than in false nonresponder hypertension (relative risk 2.33, 95% confidence interval 1.14-4.77, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that, among treated hypertensive patients receiving double therapy with uncontrolled clinic blood pressure those with true nonresponder hypertension are at higher cardiovascular risk. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring should be performed in this population to achieve a better prognostic stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pierdomenico et al. (2006) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=730). True nonresponder hypertension vs. False nonresponder hypertension was evaluated on Fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events (RR 2.33, 95% CI 1.14-4.77, p=0.02). True nonresponder hypertension was associated with a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular events compared to false nonresponder hypertension (RR 2.33; 95% CI 1.14-4.77; P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: