Key result
Prazosin formulations demonstrate bioequivalence via rapid bedside sampling with only 2 orthostatic hypotension events.
Why the study?
The study aimed to develop a rapid, simple, and sensitive LC/ESI-MS/MS method for measuring prazosin in human plasma and apply bedside sampling during bioequivalence testing to address orthostatic hypotension.
Are the two prazosin formulations bioequivalent, and does bedside sampling reduce the incidence of orthostatic hypotension?
Are the two prazosin formulations bioequivalent, and does bedside sampling reduce the incidence of orthostatic hypotension?
A highly sensitive LC/ESI-MS/MS method was developed for prazosin, and bedside sampling during bioequivalence studies effectively reduced the incidence of orthostatic hypotension.
Does not support immediate clinical adoption of new prazosin formulations; leaves open utility of bedside sampling in larger bioequivalence studies.
Objective The study aimed to develop a rapid, simple and sensitive LC/ESI-MS/MS method to measure prazosin concentration in human plasma and apply bedside sampling in bioequivalence study of two prazosin tablets to resolve the adverse effect of orthostatic hypotension.Significance The LC/ESI-MS/MS prazosin method was highly sensitive and selective. Bedside sampling reduced the orthostatic hypotension incidence and subject dropout rate.Methods After sample preparation, prazosin and terazosin (IS) were detected on mass spectrometer operating in multiple reaction monitoring mode using positive ionization. Mobile phase flow rate was set at 0.40 mL/min with sample run time of 1.75 min. The bioanalytical method was validated as per EMEA and FDA guidelines. Bedside sampling was performed in bioequivalence study for the first 4 h after dosing. The three primary pharmacokinetic parameters, Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ and 90% confidence interval were determined.Results The small injection volume of 1 μL minimized instrumentation contamination and prolonged the analytical column lifespan. Linearity was obtained between 0.5 and 30.0 ng/mL, with coefficient of determination, r2 ≥ 0.99. The mean extraction recovery of prazosin and IS was >92%, with precision value (CV, %) ≤ 10.3%. Only two orthostatic hypotension adverse events were reported. The two prazosin formulations were found to be bioequivalent.Conclusion The LC/ESI-MS/MS method has shown robustness and reliability exemplified by the incurred sample re-analysis result. Bedside sampling should be proposed for bioequivalence or pharmacokinetic studies of drugs demonstrating adverse event of orthostatic hypotension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loh et al. (2022) studied Bioequivalence of prazosin. Prazosin formulations vs. Alternative prazosin formulation was evaluated on Pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞). Two prazosin formulations were found to be bioequivalent using a rapid LC/ESI-MS/MS method and bedside sampling, which resulted in only two orthostatic hypotension adverse events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: