Key result
Growth hormone therapy yields mixed heart failure results despite one trial showing a ~12% LVEF increase.
Why the study?
Hormonal deficiencies such as impaired growth hormone signaling play a significant role in heart failure progression and prognosis, but the role of growth hormone therapy across trials remains mixed.
Does growth hormone therapy improve cardiac and functional parameters in patients with heart failure?
Systematic Review
Does growth hormone therapy improve cardiac and functional parameters in patients with heart failure?
Growth hormone therapy shows promise for improving LVEF and exercise capacity in heart failure patients, but mixed evidence necessitates larger, long-term trials.
Heart failure (HF) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. While standard treatments primarily target neurohormonal pathways, emerging evidence highlights the significant role of hormonal deficiencies, such as impaired growth hormone (GH) signaling, in HF progression and outcomes. GH is crucial for cardiovascular and skeletal muscle function, and its deficiency has been associated with worse prognosis. This review synthesizes recent findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to explore how GH can contribute to personalized care and improve patient stratification in HF. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed up to 10 October 2024. Search terms included “growth hormone” combined with “heart failure”, “HFrEF”, “HFpEF”, and “HFmrEF.” Only placebo-controlled RCTs published in English and involving human subjects were considered. Data on study design, participant characteristics, GH dosing, and key clinical outcomes were systematically extracted and analyzed. Several trials demonstrated that GH therapy can transiently improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), exercise capacity, and reduce inflammatory markers. For example, one study has reported an increase in LVEF from 32 ± 3.8% to 43.8 ± 4.6% (p = 0.002), following three months of GH therapy in post-MI HF patients. However, benefits diminished after discontinuation. Additional studies have observed sustained improvements in peak oxygen consumption and LVEF over four years, with an additional trend towards hard endpoint improvement. Conversely, some studies showed no significant impact on cardiac function, highlighting heterogeneity in outcomes. As a result, GH therapy holds promise for improving cardiac and functional parameters in HF patients, but evidence remains mixed. Larger, long-term RCTs are needed to confirm its efficacy and safety. Precision medicine approaches and biomarker-driven strategies may optimize patient outcomes and guide clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Theodorakis et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure. Growth hormone therapy vs. Placebo was evaluated. Growth hormone therapy in heart failure patients showed mixed results across trials, with one study reporting an increase in LVEF from 32% to 43.8% (p=0.002) after three months of treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: