Randomized trial demonstrates modest TAK-003 efficacy against asymptomatic dengue infection in youth, suggesting waning protection that depends on prior exposure.
BACKGROUND: TAK-003 has been shown to be well tolerated and effective against symptomatic dengue disease and hospitalization, irrespective of baseline serostatus. Most infections are asymptomatic/subclinical. This study assessed whether TAK-003 could protect against asymptomatic/subclinical infections by evaluating increased neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers after natural infection. METHODS: DEN-301 (NCT02747927) is a phase 3 trial among 4- to 16-year-old participants who received 2 doses of TAK-003 or placebo 3 months apart. These exploratory analyses used NAb measured during the trial. As no well-accepted definition for asymptomatic infection exists, 3 algorithms were evaluated: (1) 4-fold increase in NAb, (2) 4-fold increase in NAb and a minimum titer of 40, and (3) 4-fold increase in NAb and a minimum titer of 4-fold lower limit of quantification. Months 4 to 9, months 9 to 15, and months 15 to 27 after first vaccination were analyzed. RESULTS: NAbs from 3765 participants were analyzed. From months 4 to 9, vaccine efficacy (VE) against asymptomatic infection was 51.1% (95% CI, 30.4%-65.6%), 36.1% (95% CI, 6.7%-56.3%), and 27.3% (95% CI, -8.2% to 51.2%) for algorithms 1, 2, and 3, respectively. VE per algorithms 1, 2, and 3 was 54.8% (95% CI, 28.8%-71.3%), 47.9% (95% CI, 16.8%-67.4%), and 44.3% (95% CI, 9.9%-65.6%) in participants with baseline seropositivity and 44.4% (95% CI, 2.1%-68.4%), 4.6% (95% CI, -85.1% to 50.8%), and -29.3% (95% CI, -172.1% to 38.6%) in those with baseline seronegativity. VE against asymptomatic infection gradually decreased from months 4 to 9 to months 9 to 15 and from months 9 to 15 to months 15 to 27. CONCLUSIONS: The variability in VE algorithms indicates challenges in accurately assessing VE against asymptomatic infections. TAK-003 had a modest impact on asymptomatic dengue infections in the first months postvaccination, mainly in participants with baseline seropositivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hindi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: