Key result
LAAC in elderly patients is linked to a higher 45-day major bleeding rate of 6.9%.
Why the study?
Limited data describe left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) and age-related outcomes in Asians.
Does age affect short-term clinical outcomes and safety in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous LAAC?
Observational (n=548)
Yes
Does age affect short-term clinical outcomes and safety in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous LAAC?
p-value: p=0.047
LAAC is safe and effective in Japanese patients, but elderly patients (>80 years) have a significantly higher risk of major bleeding at 45 days, suggesting a need for tailored postoperative drug regimens.
May warrant cautious periprocedural management in octogenarians; leaves open optimal age-specific regimens for prospective trials.
Limited data are available describing left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) and age-related outcomes in Asians. This study summarizes the initial experience with LAAC in Japan and determines age-related clinical outcomes in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous LAAC. In an ongoing, prospective, investigator-initiated, multicenter, observational registry of patients undergoing LAAC in Japan, we analyzed short-term clinical outcomes in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAC. Patients were classified into younger, middle-aged, and elderly groups (≤70, 70 to 80, and >80 years of age, respectively) to determine age-related outcomes. Patients (n = 548; mean age, 76.4 ± 8.1 years; male, 70.3%) who underwent LAAC at 19 Japanese centers between September 2019 and June 2021 were enrolled in the study, including 104, 271, and 173 patients in the younger, middle-aged, and elderly groups, respectively. Participants had a high-risk of bleeding and thromboembolism with a mean CHADS2 score of 3.1 ± 1.3, a mean CHA2DS2-VASc score of 4.7 ± 1.5, and a mean HAS-BLED score of 3.2 ± 1.0. Device success rates were 96.5% and anticoagulants discontinuation at the 45-day follow-up was achieved in 89.9%. In-hospital outcomes were not significantly different, but major bleeding events during the 45-day follow-up were significantly higher in the elderly group compared to the other groups (younger vs middle-aged vs elderly, 1.0% vs 3.7% vs 6.9%, respectively; P = 0.047) despite the same postoperative drug regimens. The initial Japanese experience with LAAC demonstrated safety and efficacy; however, perioperative bleeding events were more common in the elderly and postoperative drug regimens must be tailored (OCEAN-LAAC [Optimized Catheter Valvular Intervention–Left Atrial Appendage Closure] registry; UMIN000038498)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asami et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=548). Left atrial appendage closure was evaluated on Major bleeding events at 45-day follow-up (p=0.047). Following left atrial appendage closure, 45-day major bleeding was significantly higher in elderly patients (>80 years) than in middle-aged and younger patients (6.9% vs 3.7% vs 1.0%; P=0.047).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: