Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study demonstrates accurate detection of pulmonary tuberculosis on chest radiographs using deep learning, indicating potential to expedite airborne isolation in emergency settings.
Prompt and correct detection of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is critical in preventing its spread. We aimed to develop a deep learning-based algorithm for detecting PTB on chest X-ray (CXRs) in the emergency department. This retrospective study included 3498 CXRs acquired from the National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH). The images were chronologically split into a training dataset, NTUH-1519 (images acquired during the years 2015 to 2019; n = 2144), and a testing dataset, NTUH-20 (images acquired during the year 2020; n = 1354). Public databases, including the NIH ChestX-ray14 dataset (model training; 112,120 images), Montgomery County (model testing; 138 images), and Shenzhen (model testing; 662 images), were also used in model development. EfficientNetV2 was the basic architecture of the algorithm. Images from ChestX-ray14 were employed for pseudo-labelling to perform semi-supervised learning. The algorithm demonstrated excellent performance in detecting PTB (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.878, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.854-0.900) in NTUH-20. The algorithm showed significantly better performance in posterior-anterior (PA) CXR (AUC 0.940, 95% CI 0.912-0.965, p-value < 0.001) compared with anterior-posterior (AUC 0.782, 95% CI 0.644-0.897) or portable anterior-posterior (AUC 0.869, 95% CI 0.814-0.918) CXR. The algorithm accurately detected cases of bacteriologically confirmed PTB (AUC 0.854, 95% CI 0.823-0.883). Finally, the algorithm tested favourably in Montgomery County (AUC 0.838, 95% CI 0.765-0.904) and Shenzhen (AUC 0.806, 95% CI 0.771-0.839). A deep learning-based algorithm could detect PTB on CXR with excellent performance, which may help shorten the interval between detection and airborne isolation for patients with PTB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: