Key result
Optimized VNS reduces myocardial injury and preserves cardiac function in post-MI rats.
Why the study?
The stimulation parameters of vagus nerve stimulation for optimal cardioprotective effects in acute myocardial infarction are highly variable and need optimization.
Does vagus nerve stimulation with optimized parameters improve post-MI protection in rats with acute myocardial infarction?
Does vagus nerve stimulation with optimized parameters improve post-MI protection in rats with acute myocardial infarction?
p-value: p=<0.05
Vagus nerve stimulation at 1 ms, 2 Hz, 3 V for 240 min provides optimal cardioprotection with minimal heart rate reduction in a rat model of acute myocardial infarction.
Optimal VNS parameters in rats preserve post-MI function with minimal HR reduction; leaves open translation to human AMI or CHF therapy.
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been shown to improve left ventricular function and survival in rats with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and this maneuver has also been adopted clinically for the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Recent in vitro and in vivo studies have suggested that VNS can modulate the level of pro-inflammatory factors. Despite the beneficial effects of VNS, the stimulation parameters for obtaining favorable outcomes appear highly variable. To optimize VNS parameters, we set up different stimulation protocols with different pulse width (1-2 ms), frequency (1-6 Hz), voltage (1-6 V) and duration (40-240 min) of VNS by uniform design (UD). Rats were divided into seven groups with (Group1-Group6) or without VNS (MI group). Our results demonstrate that (1) the parameter sets in Group1, Group2 and Group3 yield the best post-MI protection by VNS, while the protective role were not observed in Group4, Group5 and Group6; (2) baroreflex sensitivity and the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor level were also increased in Group1, Group2 and Group3. (3) the parameter set in Group1 (G1:1 ms, 2 Hz, 3 V, 240 min) is judged the most optimal parameter in this study as rats in this group not only showed a reduced myocardial injury with better-preserved cardiac function compared with other groups, more important, but also exhibited minimal heart rate (HR) reduction. (4) the duration of VNS plays an important role in determining the protection effect of VNS. In conclusion, VNS displays a beneficial role in Group1, Group2 and Group3. Of note, the parameter set in Group1 provides the most optimal cardioprotective effect. These results may provide insight into development of novel treatment for ischemic heart diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kong et al. (2012) studied Acute Myocardial Infarction. Vagus nerve stimulation vs. No vagus nerve stimulation (MI control) was evaluated on Myocardial injury and cardiac function (p=<0.05). Vagus nerve stimulation using the optimal parameter set of 1 ms, 2 Hz, 3 V for 240 minutes significantly reduced myocardial injury and preserved cardiac function with minimal heart rate reduction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: