Key result
Drug store BP monitors show no significant difference in readings versus validated home monitors.
Why the study?
Publicly accessible drug store blood pressure monitors are widely used but little information is available on their accuracy compared to validated home monitors.
Do drug store blood pressure monitors provide accurate readings compared to a validated home monitor?
Cross-Sectional (n=3)
Do drug store blood pressure monitors provide accurate readings compared to a validated home monitor?
Drug store blood pressure monitors provide average readings comparable to validated home monitors, though individual single readings may vary widely.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Drug store monitors show acceptable average accuracy but wide single-reading variability; leaves open need for larger validation before routine clinical reliance.
OBJECTIVES: Publically accessible blood pressure monitors are widely used, but little information is available on their accuracy. We compared blood pressure readings of 17 drug store monitors with those obtained using a validated home monitor (Omron BP742CAN) and both with those taken at home using the Canadian Hypertension Education Program protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Duplicate readings were taken using the drug store monitor (VitaStat, n=6, and PharmaSmart, n=11) on the left arm and the Omron on the right in three participants: two normal and one untreated hypertensive patient. We used Bland-Altman methods for comparison. We explored the correlation with average home blood pressure readings. RESULTS: Home average blood pressure for our three participants was 121±6/73±5, 106±6/62±4, and 142±8/81±7 mmHg. The mean systolic blood pressure difference (drug store-Omron) was -1.8±8.2 mmHg. Diastolic pressure difference was 1.7±5.6. Individual paired systolic differences varied from -19 to 14 mmHg. For the participant who required a large cuff, drug store systolic readings tended to be higher (4.1±6.7). In our three participants, drug store monitors as a group read higher than home systolic blood pressure: 7.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-13.4], 1.2 (95% CI -4.0 to 6.4), and 1.0 (95% CI -2.5 to 4.4) mmHg. Diastolic blood pressure and heart rate differences were similar in magnitude. CONCLUSION: On average, drug store monitors recorded lower systolic blood pressures and higher diastolic blood pressures than a validated monitor, but the difference was neither statistically nor clinically significant. Single reading comparisons showed a much broader range. In three participants, drug store monitors did reflect the average home blood pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ross et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=3). Drug store blood pressure monitors vs. Validated home monitor (Omron BP742CAN) was evaluated on Mean systolic blood pressure difference (MD -1.8). Drug store blood pressure monitors recorded lower systolic (-1.8±8.2 mmHg) and higher diastolic (1.7±5.6 mmHg) pressures than a validated monitor, but the difference was not significant.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: