Key result
Quantitative flow ratio shows no link to non-target vessel events before staged PCI in ACS.
Why the study?
The optimal timing of staged PCI in ACS patients remains debated, and it was unknown whether quantitative flow ratio could refine timing of non-target vessel staged PCI beyond clinical judgment.
Does quantitative flow ratio (QFR) predict non-target vessel events before planned staged PCI in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Cohort (n=1,093)
No
Does quantitative flow ratio (QFR) predict non-target vessel events before planned staged PCI in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
In patients with ACS scheduled for staged PCI, QFR of non-target vessels did not independently predict events before the planned procedure, suggesting it may not refine the timing of staged PCI beyond clinical judgment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
QFR of non-target vessels was not independently associated with events before staged PCI in ACS; leaves open its role in refining staging decisions.
Background The optimal time point of staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a matter of debate. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel noninvasive method to assess the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses. We aimed to investigate whether QFR could refine the timing of staged PCI of non‐target vessels (non‐TVs) on top of clinical judgment for patients with ACS. Methods and Results For this cohort study, patients with ACS from Bern University Hospital, Switzerland, scheduled to undergo out‐of‐hospital non‐TV staged PCI were eligible. The primary end point was the composite of non‐TV myocardial infarction and urgent unplanned non‐TV PCI before planned staged PCI. The association between lowest QFR per patient measured in the non‐TV (from index angiogram) and the primary end point was assessed using multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards regressions with QFR included as linear or penalized spline (nonlinear) term. QFR was measured in 1093 of 1432 patients with ACS scheduled to undergo non‐TV staged PCI. Median time to staged PCI was 28 days. The primary end point occurred in 5% of the patients. In multivariable analysis (1018 patients), there was no independent association between non‐TV QFR and the primary end point (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.69–1.05] per 0.1 increase; P =0.125; nonlinear P =0.648). Conclusions In selected patients with ACS scheduled to undergo staged PCI at a median of 4 weeks after index PCI, QFR did not emerge as an independent predictor of non‐TV events before planned staged PCI. Thus, this study does not provide conceptual evidence that QFR is helpful to refine the timing of staged PCI on top of clinical judgment. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02241291.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bär et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (n=1,093). Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) was evaluated on Composite of non-target vessel myocardial infarction and urgent unplanned non-target vessel PCI before planned staged PCI (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69-1.05, p=0.125). Quantitative flow ratio was not independently associated with non-target vessel events before planned staged PCI in patients with acute coronary syndrome (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69-1.05; P=0.125).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: