Key result
Higher annual humidity links to ~50% greater OCT plaque vulnerability, while temperature inversely correlates with MACE.
Why the study?
Do environmental exposures and meteorological variables affect coronary plaque vulnerability assessed by OCT and long-term clinical outcomes?
Cohort (n=508)
Do environmental exposures and meteorological variables affect coronary plaque vulnerability assessed by OCT and long-term clinical outcomes?
Odds Ratio: 1.5 (95% CI 1.04–2.18)
Environmental exposures, including traffic-related air pollution and climate variables, are associated with in vivo coronary plaque vulnerability and long-term cardiovascular outcomes.
Associations between air pollution and OCT plaque features are hypothesis-generating; leaves open causal effects on vulnerability or outcomes.
Background Environmental exposures may trigger acute coronary events, but links with in vivo plaque microstructure remain unclear. We examined associations between air pollution/meteorological variables and optical coherence tomography (OCT) plaque vulnerability, and explored long–term outcomes (Figure 1). Methods We retrospectively analysed a registry of 508 patients undergoing coronary OCT (mean age 65.5±12.0 years; 22.9% women). Exposures to PM10, NO₂, benzene, and meteorological variables (temperature, humidity, pressure, rainfall) were summarized over prespecified windows preceding the index procedure. OCT was analysed in a core laboratory. Regression models tested associations with OCT features, including a four–criterion vulnerability composite (Figure 1A-B). Clinical outcomes were evaluated during follow–up (Figure 1C). Results Across OCT analyses (up to N=505), higher long–term NO₂exposure (hours above mean over 1 year) was associated with a large macrophage arc (›67°) (adjusted OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.06–1.79). Lower annual temperature was associated with macrophage presence (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34–0.92). Higher annual humidity was associated with the vulnerability composite (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.04–2.18) and with TCFA (‹75 μm) (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.03–1.42). NO₂over 3 months was associated with layered tissue (adjusted OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02–1.24). Over a median follow–up of 6.8 years, 46 events occurred (incidence 9.1%, 95% CI 6.7–11.9%). In multivariable outcome models, annual temperature remained inversely associated with MACE (OR 0.074, 95% CI 0.020–0.278), whereas PM10 over 1 month showed borderline significance (Figure 1B-C). Conclusions Environmental exposures, including traffic–related air pollution and climate–related variables, were associated with in vivo OCT signatures of plaque inflammation and vulnerability. The observed relationships with macrophage arc, TCFA, layered tissue, and the vulnerability composite suggest that chronic ambient conditions may influence plaque biology beyond traditional risk factors. Furthermore, long–term temperature exposure was independently associated with incident MACE during follow–up, highlighting the potential prognostic relevance of environmental profiling. These findings support integrating environmental data into cardiovascular risk assessment and motivate prospective studies to confirm causality and identify modifiable exposure windows (Figure 1).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lauretti et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Coronary plaque vulnerability (n=508). Environmental exposures (air pollution and meteorological variables) was evaluated on OCT plaque vulnerability composite (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.04-2.18). Higher annual humidity was associated with the OCT plaque vulnerability composite (OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.04-2.18), and annual temperature was inversely associated with incident MACE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: