Key result
High peri-coronary adipose tissue attenuation was significantly associated with increased plaque vulnerability, including lipid-rich plaque (87.3% vs 77.8%; P=0.006) and plaque rupture (38.1% vs 23.9%).
Why the study?
Vascular inflammation drives atherogenesis and acute coronary syndromes, but the relationship between coronary inflammation measured by PCAT attenuation on CT angiography and OCT plaque characteristics required evaluation.
Does high peri-coronary adipose tissue attenuation on CT correlate with optical coherence tomography features of plaque vulnerability in patients with coronary artery disease?
Population
474 patients (198 ACS and 276 stable angina pectoris) undergoing preintervention CTA and OCT
Comparison
High PCAT attenuation (n=244) vs low PCAT attenuation (n=230) using a -70.1 HU threshold
Design
Observational study
Authors
Loading...
PCAT attenuation on CTA may aid identification of high-risk plaques; confirms link to OCT vulnerability features across ACS and stable CAD.
Observational (n=474)
Does high peri-coronary adipose tissue attenuation on CT correlate with optical coherence tomography features of plaque vulnerability in patients with coronary artery disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 87.3% vs 77.8%
p-value: p=0.006
High peri-coronary adipose tissue attenuation on CT is significantly associated with OCT features of plaque vulnerability, highlighting the link between vascular inflammation and plaque instability.
Yuki et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (acute coronary syndromes and stable angina pectoris) (n=474). High peri-coronary adipose tissue (PCAT) attenuation (≥ -70.1 HU) vs. Low PCAT attenuation (< -70.1 HU) was evaluated on Optical coherence tomography features of plaque vulnerability (e.g., lipid-rich plaque) (p=0.006). High peri-coronary adipose tissue attenuation was significantly associated with increased plaque vulnerability, including lipid-rich plaque (87.3% vs 77.8%; P=0.006) and plaque rupture (38.1% vs 23.9%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: