Key result
Higher EF in elderly HFpEF is linked to ~8% greater all-cause mortality risk.
Why the study?
Pathophysiological differences between HF patients with normal and supra-normal EF have been highlighted, but these distinct EF phenotypes have been poorly investigated in elderly patients aged ≥70 years.
Does a supra-normal ejection fraction (≥65%) increase the risk of mortality and rehospitalization in elderly HFpEF patients compared to a normal ejection fraction (50-64%)?
Cohort (n=200)
No
Does a supra-normal ejection fraction (≥65%) increase the risk of mortality and rehospitalization in elderly HFpEF patients compared to a normal ejection fraction (50-64%)?
In elderly patients with HFpEF, a supra-normal ejection fraction (≥65%) at admission is an independent predictor of higher all-cause mortality and rehospitalization compared to an ejection fraction of 50-64%.
May warrant caution with supra-normal EF in elderly HFpEF; leaves open prospective validation of distinct phenotypes.
Background During the last few years, significant pathophysiological differences between heart failure (HF) patients with “normal” ejection fraction (EF) (50% to 64%) and those with supra–normal EF (≥65%) have been highlighted. However, these distinct EF phenotypes have been poorly investigated in elderly patients aged ≥70 yrs. Accordingly, the present study aimed at assessing the clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of a retrospective cohort of elderly HFpEF patients (aged ≥70 yrs), categorized on the basis of “normal” EF (50 to 64%) or “supra–normal” EF (≥65%). Methods All patients aged ≥70 yrs discharged from our Institution with a first diagnosis of HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) between January 2020 and March 2021 entered the study. All patients underwent clinical evaluation, blood tests and transthoracic echocardiography. The primary endpoint was “all–cause mortality”, while the secondary one was the composite “all–cause mortality or rehospitalization for all causes” over a mid–term follow–up. Results A total of 200 HFpEF patients (86.4±6.6 yrs, 70% females) were retrospectively evaluated. The “normal” EF group (n=99) and the “supra–normal” EF one (n=101) were separately analysed. Compared to patients with “normal” EF, those with “supra–normal” EF were older, with greater comorbidity burden and moderate–to–severe frailty status. Mean follow–up duration was 3.6±0.3 yrs. During follow–up, 79 patients died and 73 were re–hospitalized. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, age (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03–1.16, p=0.002), EF (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03–1.14, p=0.004), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)/systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) ratio (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03–0.61, p=0.009) and infectious disease occurring during the baseline stay (HR 7.23, 95% CI 2.41–21.6, p‹0.001) were independently associated with the primary endpoint in the whole study population. EF (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.07, p=0.02) also predicted the secondary endpoint. EF ≥65% was the best cut–off to predict both endpoints. Conclusions “Supra–normal” EF (≥65%) at hospital admission is independently associated with all–cause mortality and rehospitalization for all causes in elderly HFpEF patients over a mid–term follow–up. Kaplan–Meier survival curves drawn to compare the rates of “all–cause mortality” (Figure 1) and the composite of “all–cause mortality or reospitalization for all causes” (Figure 2) in HFpEF patients, categorized according to LVEF value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sonaglioni et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=200). Supra-normal ejection fraction (≥65%) vs. Normal ejection fraction (50-64%) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.14, p=0.004). In elderly patients with HFpEF, ejection fraction was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03-1.14; p=0.004), with EF ≥65% being the best predictive cut-off.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: