Key result
Extracardiac conduit Fontan is linked to ~83% fewer late arrhythmias versus atriopulmonary connection.
Why the study?
The impact of surgical type and risk factors on arrhythmia development after Fontan surgery remains incompletely understood.
Does extracardiac conduit Fontan reduce the risk of late arrhythmias compared to atriopulmonary or lateral tunnel Fontan in patients with univentricular physiology?
Cohort (n=1,492)
Yes
Does extracardiac conduit Fontan reduce the risk of late arrhythmias compared to atriopulmonary or lateral tunnel Fontan in patients with univentricular physiology?
Extracardiac conduit Fontan is associated with a significantly lower long-term risk of arrhythmias compared to atriopulmonary and lateral tunnel techniques, and late-onset arrhythmias are a strong marker for subsequent Fontan failure and mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May favor extracardiac conduit Fontan to lower arrhythmia risk; extends observational data but should not yet change practice.
AIMS: Awareness of long-term arrhythmia complications after Fontan surgery is increasing, but the impact of surgical type and risk factors on arrhythmia development remain incompletely understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed 1492 Fontan patients from the Korean multicentre registry (1979-2019), categorized into atriopulmonary connection (AP) (n = 106), lateral tunnel (LT) (n = 234), and extracardiac conduit (ECC) (n = 1143) with a median follow-up of 14 years. Arrhythmias occurred in 13.3% of patients at a median age of 17.3 years (tachyarrhythmias 9.9%, bradyarrhythmias 6.8%). At 20 years, freedom from any arrhythmia, tachyarrhythmia, and bradyarrhythmia was 82.5%, 86.9%, and 90.5%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, AP (HR 5.89, 95% CI 3.75-9.25; P < 0.001) and LT (HR 2.85, 95% CI 1.93-4.21; P < 0.001) were associated with a higher risk of arrhythmia compared with ECC. Older age at Fontan surgery also independently increased arrhythmia risk (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.10; P < 0.001). Compared with ECC Fontan, LT Fontan and AP Fontan were associated with a progressively higher risk of both tachyarrhythmias (HR 2.99 and 8.20, respectively) and bradyarrhythmias (HR 2.63 and 5.47, respectively; all P < 0.001). The all-cause mortality rate and Fontan failure rate were 9.3% (0.69 per 100 patient-years) and 20.0% (1.61 per 100 patient-years), respectively. Late-onset arrhythmias were associated with an increased risk of mortality and Fontan failure (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This large, long-term registry shows that ECC Fontan confers a lower arrhythmia risk than LT or AP, and arrhythmias serve as a marker of Fontan failure and mortality in post-Fontan patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoon et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Univentricular physiology requiring Fontan procedure (n=1,492). Atriopulmonary connection (AP) Fontan vs. Extracardiac conduit (ECC) Fontan was evaluated on First onset of any clinically significant arrhythmia (HR 5.89, 95% CI 3.75-9.25, p=<0.001). Atriopulmonary connection and lateral tunnel Fontan procedures were associated with a 5.89-fold and 2.85-fold higher risk of late arrhythmias, respectively, compared with extracardiac conduit Fontan.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: