Key result
Atriopulmonary and lateral tunnel Fontans linked to up to ~489% higher arrhythmia risk versus extracardiac conduit.
Why the study?
The impact of surgical type and risk factors on arrhythmia development after Fontan surgery remains incompletely understood.
Does extracardiac conduit (ECC) Fontan surgery reduce the risk of late arrhythmias compared to atriopulmonary connection or lateral tunnel Fontan in post-Fontan patients?
Population
1492 Fontan patients from the Korean multicentre registry
Comparison
AP vs LT vs ECC Fontan surgery
Design
Retrospective multicentre registry study
Follow-up
Median 14 years
Authors
Loading...
May favor extracardiac conduit Fontan to lower arrhythmia risk; hypothesis-generating for effects on mortality and failure pending prospective trials.
Cohort (n=1,492)
Yes
Does extracardiac conduit (ECC) Fontan surgery reduce the risk of late arrhythmias compared to atriopulmonary connection or lateral tunnel Fontan in post-Fontan patients?
Hazard Ratio: 5.89 (95% CI 3.75–9.25)
p-value: p=<0.001
Extracardiac conduit Fontan surgery is associated with a significantly lower risk of late arrhythmias compared to atriopulmonary connection and lateral tunnel techniques, with arrhythmias serving as a marker for mortality and Fontan failure.
Yoon et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Post-Fontan surgery patients (n=1,492). Atriopulmonary connection (AP) or lateral tunnel (LT) Fontan surgery vs. Extracardiac conduit (ECC) Fontan surgery was evaluated on Arrhythmia (HR 5.89, 95% CI 3.75-9.25, p=<0.001). Atriopulmonary connection and lateral tunnel Fontan surgeries were associated with a significantly higher risk of arrhythmias compared with extracardiac conduit Fontan (HR 5.89 and 2.85; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: