Retrospective study observes trade-offs between Chevron combined with Scarf versus Lapidus osteotomy in hallux valgus, suggesting tailored surgical selection.
Objective This paper aims to assess the clinical effectiveness of combining distal first metatarsal biplanar Chevron osteotomy with either midshaft Scarf or proximal Lapidus osteotomy in treating moderate-to-severe hallux valgus.Methods This retrospective study included patients with moderate-to-severe hallux valgus treated with Chevron + Scarf or Chevron + Lapidus osteotomy and followed for at least 6 months. Outcomes included VAS, HVA, IMA, DMAA, AOFAS score, SF-36, osteotomy healing time, full weight-bearing time, and complications.Results Eighty-eight patients were included: 49 in the Chevron + Scarf group and 39 in the Chevron + Lapidus group. The Chevron + Scarf group had lower VAS scores at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively (P < 0.05), whereas the Chevron + Lapidus group achieved lower HVA and IMA at 3 and 6 months (P < 0.05). Healing time and time to full weight-bearing were shorter in the Chevron + Scarf group (P < 0.05). Improvements in DMAA, AOFAS, and SF-36 scores and complication rates were comparable between groups (P > 0.05).Conclusion Both osteotomy strategies effectively correct moderate-to-severe hallux valgus. Each combination has relative advantages, and surgical choice should be tailored to the patient’s anatomical and functional needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: