Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 1, 1998Diabetes Care

Reversion From Type 2 Diabetes to Nondiabetic Status: Influence of the 1997 American Diabetes Association criteria

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

The 1997 ADA criteria show no difference in type 2 diabetes reversion versus 1980 WHO criteria.

  • n=3,682

Why the study?

The influence of the 1997 ADA criteria on the incidence and reversion rates of type 2 diabetes to nondiabetic status was uncertain, with few studies addressing reversion using previous criteria.

Population

3,682 Mexican-American and non-Hispanic white men and nonpregnant women in the San Antonio Heart Study

Comparison

1980 WHO criteria vs 1997 ADA criteria for diabetes diagnosis

Design

Cohort study

Follow-up

7 to 8 years

Authors

JBJ. P. BurkeSHSteven M. HaffnerSGSharon P. Gaskill

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Reversion rates similar across criteria; supports diagnostic consistency in this cohort but leaves broader outcome effects open.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=3,682)

Structured PICO

P
Population
3,682 Mexican-American and non-Hispanic white men and nonpregnant women followed for 7 to 8 years to assess type 2 diabetes incidence and reversion rates.
O
Outcome
Incidence of type 2 diabetes and rate of reversion to a nondiabetic statussurrogate

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 12.5% vs 11.5%

The 1997 ADA criteria for diabetes diagnosis did not significantly alter the observed incidence or reversion rates of type 2 diabetes compared to the older 1980 WHO criteria.

Cite This Study

Burke et al. (1998) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes (n=3,682). 1997 ADA criteria vs. 1980 WHO criteria was evaluated on Reversion rate for individuals with type 2 diabetes. The 1997 ADA criteria yielded a 12.5% reversion rate from type 2 diabetes to nondiabetic status, which was not significantly different from the 11.5% rate observed using the 1980 WHO criteria.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa91bde4ecef0db9504e45dhttps://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.21.8.1266
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Increased Incidence of Type II Diabetes Mellitus in Mexican Americans1991 · 175 citations
  2. 2Do Upper-Body and Centralized Adiposity Measure Different Aspects of Regional Body-Fat Distribution? Relationship to Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus, Lipids, and Lipoproteins1987 · 302 citations
  3. 3Clustering of cardiovascular risk factors in confirmed prehypertensive individuals.1992 · 206 citations
  4. 4Foundations of Epidemiology.1977 · 1,165 citations
  5. 5SEX DIFFERENCE IN THE EFFECTS OF SOCIOCULTURAL STATUS ON DIABETES AND CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTORS IN MEXICAN AMERICANS: THE SAN ANTONIO HEART STUDY1984 · 316 citations