Key result
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound shows better histologic concordance for tumor depth and diameter versus conventional ultrasound.
Why the study?
Small series of ultrasound findings in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) have been published, but the usefulness of elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has not been studied.
Does multimodal ultrasound improve preoperative evaluation of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans?
Observational (n=40)
No
Does multimodal ultrasound improve preoperative evaluation of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans?
p-value: p=<0.05
Multimodal ultrasound, particularly contrast-enhanced ultrasound, improves the preoperative evaluation of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans by better determining tumor extension.
Multimodal ultrasound may correlate with DFSP extensions preoperatively; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare, low to intermediate-grade sarcoma, which needs imaging examination. Small series of ultrasound findings in DFSP have been published; however, the usefulness of elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in DFSP has not been studied. We aim to study multimodal ultrasound findings and report the correlation between imagings and tiny extension in DFSP for preoperative evaluation. METHODS: Two-D ultrasound, 3-D color ultrasound, elastography, and CEUS findings were retrospectively evaluated. Forty histopathologically confirmed DFSPs were studied. RESULTS: On 2-D ultrasound, 26(65%) appeared as mostly hypoechoic lesions with occasional hyperechoic dots within the tumor matrix and lobulated lateral borders. Eight (20%) lesions were multilayered. Ninety-five percent of lesions showed increased vascularity. On 3-D ultrasound, DFSPs showed branch-shaped, striped, and wrapped color patterns. Power Doppler showed mainly artery of a moderate arterial peak systolic blood flow and low resistance index. DFSP is hard on elastography. On CEUS, DFSPs showed a long peak time, low peak and a small amount of perfusion around the tumor, 73.7% (14/19) of lesions showed a heterogeneous contrast enhancement and 89.5% (17/19) of lesions showed hyper-enhancement. CEUS showed better concordance than US with histology on the maximum diameter and depth (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal ultrasound showed significant characteristics in DFSP, which would improve diagnostic accuracy. CEUS could be an effective tool to determine tiny tumor extension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gong et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (n=40). Multimodal ultrasound (including CEUS) vs. Conventional ultrasound / Histology was evaluated on Concordance of tumor depth and maximum diameter with histology (p=<0.05). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound showed better concordance with histology for determining tumor depth and maximum diameter compared to conventional ultrasound (P < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: