Ultrasound demonstrated superior ability in detecting muscle invasion and defining tumour boundaries (81.8% sensitivity, 100% specificity) compared to MRI (67% sensitivity, 100% specificity).
What is the effectiveness of various non-invasive imaging modalities in the assessment and management of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans?
Ultrasound, MRI, and CT are the primary imaging modalities for DFSP, with emerging technologies holding promise for refining diagnostic and management strategies.
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma characterized by an asymmetric, infiltrative growth pattern and a high risk of local recurrence. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various imaging modalities in the assessment and management of DFSP. Nine imaging modalities were reviewed including: Ultrasound (US), High-Frequency Doppler Ultrasound (HFUS), Computed tomography (CT), Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), High-resolution-MRI (HR-MRI), Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS), Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), and Dermatoscopy. Imaging is mainly used for preoperative assessment and surgical planning, not routine diagnosis. US is effective for initial evaluations, demonstrating superior ability in detecting muscle invasion and defining tumour boundaries (sensitivity - 81.8%, specificity - 100%). MRI is valuable for preoperative evaluation, surgical planning, and monitoring DFSP recurrence. It more accurately assesses tumour depth than palpation, with a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 100%, but was inferior when compared to US. CT is utilized in cases of suspected bone involvement or pulmonary metastasis. For advanced or recurrent DFSP, PET-CT helps manage treatment responses and imatinib therapy. Emerging technologies like MRS and OCT show potential in improving diagnostic accuracy and defining surgical margins, though more data are needed. US, MRI, and CT are the primary imaging modalities for DFSP. Emerging technologies like HR-MRI, PET-CT, MRS, and OCT hold promise for refining diagnostic and management strategies. Integrating multiple technologies could enhance management, particularly in atypical or aggressive cases. Further studies are required to refine imaging protocols and improve DFSP outcomes.
Algarin et al. (Thu,) conducted a review in Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). Non-invasive imaging modalities (US, MRI, CT, PET-CT, etc.) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of imaging modalities. Ultrasound demonstrated superior ability in detecting muscle invasion and defining tumour boundaries (81.8% sensitivity, 100% specificity) compared to MRI (67% sensitivity, 100% specificity).