Benchmarking study demonstrates improved cross-domain taxonomic profiling accuracy across diverse metagenomes, highlighting its utility for challenging low-biomass and clinical samples.
Taxonomic profiling is fundamental to microbiome research, yet achieving high species-level accuracy remains challenging for complex communities that span bacteria, viruses, eukaryotes, and archaea, and these limitations are exacerbated in low-biomass, host-dominated samples. We introduce Metax, a cross-domain taxonomic profiler that integrates coverage-based probabilistic modeling with an expectation-maximization framework to distinguish true microbial signals from artifacts. Across >600 samples from host-associated, environmental, wastewater, and low-biomass clinical settings, including benchmarks with limited reference representation, Metax improved profiling accuracy, achieving on average 55% higher F1 scores and 45% lower Bray-Curtis dissimilarity than other methods. Moreover, this broad evaluation demonstrated that Metax resolved bacterial and viral signatures of peri-implantitis in oral microbiomes and revealed signals suggestive of reagent-borne contaminants and reference misassemblies in plasma-cell-free DNA. By leveraging genome-wide coverage evidence, Metax enables robust cross-domain profiling across diverse sample types and sequencing depths, including settings where reference databases are highly incomplete.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: